- From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 12:37:11 +0100
- To: timrdf@gmail.com
- Cc: public-owl-comments@w3.org
Dear Tim, I should have CCed you on this message -- sorry. Hopefully our response to Holger also addresses your concern. Regards, Ian Begin forwarded message: > Resent-From: public-owl-comments@w3.org > From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk> > Date: 13 August 2009 12:28:57 BDT > To: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com> > Cc: public-owl-comments@w3.org > Subject: [LC response] To Holger Knublauch > > Dear Holger, > > Thank you for your comment > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/ > 2009Jul/0007.html> > on the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts. > > The working group has decided to take up your suggestion and define > an RDF specification of the OWL 2 vocabulary in the RDF/XML > exchange format. A draft of this specification can be found at [1]. > The intention is that, when OWL 2 becomes a recommendation, the > specification will be placed at [2]. > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Owl2DotOwlDevel > [2] http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl > > Please acknowledge receipt of this email to <mailto:public-owl- > comments@w3.org> (replying to this email should suffice). In your > acknowledgment please let us know whether or not you are satisfied > with the working group's response to your comment. > > Regards, > Ian Horrocks > on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group > > >
Received on Thursday, 13 August 2009 11:38:04 UTC