- From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 18:38:30 +0100
- To: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>
- Cc: public-owl-comments@w3.org, public-swd-wg@w3.org
On 7 Apr 2009, at 16:01, Guus Schreiber wrote: > > > Ian Horrocks wrote: >> Dear SWD WG, >> We sent you a response [1] to your comment [2] on the OWL 2 Web >> Ontology Language last call drafts, but to date we do not appear >> to have received any reply. If we don't hear from you we will >> assume that you are satisfied with the working group's response to >> your comment. > > Ian, > > Sorry for our delayed response. Thanks a lot for the way in which > the OWL WG has taken our comments into account. In general, we are > happy with your responses. We would like to have to have a chance > to see the new documents before we give an official OK. As you probably know, we will shortly (I hope) publish a 2nd set of Last Call Working Drafts -- I will let you know when they are published. You are, of course, very welcome to look at and comment on them. > > One point remains: we still feel it would be very appropriate if > the "New Features & Rationale" document [1] would contain (also) > RDF syntax, as this will be the document that existing RDF/OWL > users (and thus SKOS users) will go to when they want to know > what's new in OWL 2. This is already in progress -- see [1]. Thanks, Ian [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/New_Features_and_Rationale > > Thanks again! > > Best, > Guus > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-owl2-new-features-20081202/ > >> Regards, >> Ian Horrocks >> on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group >> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/ >> 2009Mar/0060.html >> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009Jan/ >> 0084.html<schreiber.vcf>
Received on Tuesday, 7 April 2009 17:39:11 UTC