- From: Bernard Aboba <Bernard.Aboba@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 20:40:13 +0000
- To: openpeer/ortc <ortc@noreply.github.com>, "public-ortc@w3.org" <public-ortc@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 18 July 2014 20:40:44 UTC
If a given codec can only handle a single transport mode it is not an issue. But it would be strange to have to have "VP8" and "VP8-MS" codec names, one denoting SST-SS and the other SST-MS. On Jul 18, 2014, at 12:05 PM, Robin Raymond <notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com>> wrote: Maybe I don't understand the proposal but I don't like "magic" codec names where I parse out meaning from the name. I'd rather have a flag and be clear if the codec supports MSS vs not supported. You still need two codecs in that case if the codec supports either operating mode but I don't like the idea of parsing out "-mss" or something to know the codec supports it. — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/openpeer/ortc/issues/108#issuecomment-49468028>.
Received on Friday, 18 July 2014 20:40:44 UTC