- From: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 12:11:52 -0700
- To: Bernard Aboba <Bernard.Aboba@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "public-ortc@w3.org" <public-ortc@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 18 July 2014 19:12:59 UTC
That text sounds good to me. On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Bernard Aboba <Bernard.Aboba@microsoft.com> wrote: > While no specification change is required, it would be useful to add a > Section 16 on WebRTC compatibility issues, so as to answer this and other > potential WebRTC compatibility questions. Here is the proposed text for a > Section 16.1 within that section: > > 16.1 Voice Activity Detection > > [WEBRTC10] Section 4.2.4 defines the RTCOfferOptions dictionary, which > includes the voiceActivityDetection attribute, which determines whether > Voice Activity Detection (VAD) is enabled within the Offer produced by > createOffer(). The effect of setting voiceActivityDetection to TRUE is to > include the Comfort Noice (CN) codec defined in [RFC3389] within the Offer. > > Within ORTC API, equivalent behavior can be obtained by configuring the > Comfort Noise codec for use within the RTCRtpParameters object, or > configuring a codec with built-in support for Comfort Noise (such as G.729) > to enable comfort noise. >
Received on Friday, 18 July 2014 19:12:59 UTC