Re: Inactive Specifcation Co-authors

To be in closer conformance with W3C WebRTC WG 1.0 spec, we have gone with
an Acknowledgements section in the Appendix to thank those who contributed.

Thanks to everyone for your feedback.

Cheers,
Erik

*Erik Lagerway <http://ca.linkedin.com/in/lagerway> | *Hookflash
<http://hookflash.com/>* | 1 (855) Hookflash ext. 2 | Twitter
<http://twitter.com/elagerway> | WebRTC.is Blog <http://webrtc.is/> *


On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Erik Lagerway <erik@hookflash.com> wrote:

> In an effort to cut down on the amount of "noise" at the top of the spec,
> I would like to propose one of the following for us "inactive" spec
> co-authors (myself included):
>
> 1. Removal of inactive spec co-authors. The thinking here is that
> co-authors that are no longer active should likely be removed.  The
> previous spec where they did contribute will still hold those names.
>
> *or*
>
> 2. List all inactive spec co-authors under a section at the bottom of the
> document labeled as "Previous Authors". Maybe just above the current
> References section would make the most sense?
>
> Not trying to create a sh*t storm here, just thinking that its a
> bit imprecise the way it sits today.
>
> Hoping the other co-authors will chime in here.
>
> /Erik
>
> *Erik Lagerway <http://ca.linkedin.com/in/lagerway>  | *Hookflash
> <http://hookflash.com/> * | 1 (855) Hookflash ext. 2 | Twitter
> <http://twitter.com/elagerway>  | WebRTC.is Blog <http://webrtc.is/>  *
>