Re: RTCSession object

> Emil Ivov <mailto:emcho@jitsi.org>
> April 25, 2014 at 7:19 AM
> (I don't suppose this was meant to be private so CCing the list again)
>
[RR] No, it wasn't.
>
>
> Yes, I wasn't really that worried about the ICE part. During the last 
> call however, Justin mentioned a few other reasons where we'd need to 
> use such a context. Not sure I remember them all but synchronisation 
> might have been one. CNAME generation too. Was there anything else?

[RR] We hadn't decided upon other aspects being tied to a context so I 
think we need to discuss each item and see if a) context is needed to do 
proper thing and b) which exact objects require such a context and c) if 
a "default" was assumed, would that cause problems for the standard 
simple use cases.
>
> Emil
>