If the 1.0 spec is ambiguous, we need to resolve it there. If we resolve
it here independently and then it gets resolved there later in a different
way, that would not be fun.
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Robin Raymond <robin@hookflash.com> wrote:
>
> [RR]
>
> I looked at this spec and that's where my ambiguity came from. I don't
> think that spec defines all the behaviours to resolve the ambiguities. Do
> you have another source?
>
> I was reading:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/webrtc/
>
> [/RR]
>
> Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
> April 23, 2014 at 6:17 PM
>
> [...]
>
> [RR] I'm fine with the rules so long as they are clear an unambiguous.
>> Who would have the answers to clarify some of these ambiguous situations?
>>
>
> To answer that, I would go read the latest spec.
>
>
>>
>>
>>
