- From: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 10:04:54 -0700
- To: "public-ortc@w3.org" <public-ortc@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAJrXDUFaEUBx5ezDJ4M5gsoFg7gYRpWqA4JRUmD-=TLVv-Ovmw@mail.gmail.com>
I've noticed that createDataChannel and the RTCDataChannel contructor overlap in functionality. And since almost all of the current API is based around using constructors instead of factory methods, I think we can cleanup the overlap and make it consistent with the rest of the API by doing the following: [Constructor(RTCDataTransport transport, RTCDataChannelParameters parameters)] interface RTCDataChannel : EventTarget { readonly attribute RTCDataTransport transport; readonly attribute RTCDataChannelParameters parameters; void send (Object data); attribute EventHandler ondata; }; interface RTCDataTransport { } interface RTCSctpTransport : RTCDataTransport { // ... } The difference is basically that: 1. We no longer have a createDataChannel method, and just call the constructor instead. 2. RTCDataChannel no longer relies directly on SctpTransport. In the future, we could have a different kind of DataTransport and have DataChannels that work with it (we aren't as tightly coupled to SCTP).
Received on Tuesday, 15 April 2014 17:06:02 UTC