- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 14:48:10 -0800
- To: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
- Cc: Chris Wendt <chris-w3c@chriswendt.net>, "public-orca@w3.org" <public-orca@w3.org>
On 19 February 2014 14:38, Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com> wrote:
> {
> frameratePriorty: 0.5,
> resolutionPriority: 0.1,
> qualityPriority: 1.0
> }
>
I think that I meant this:
resources: 1, // relative proportion of resources to allocate
// this could be somewhat deterministic and measurable
preferences: {
framerate: 0.5,
resolution: 0.1,
quality: 0.8
}
> Meaning "I want really high quality, with good framerate, and I don't care
> about resolution."
Yep.
> I actually had just that in an earlier design, but the complexity didn't
> seem worth it. But it's certainly worth discussing.
I see this as less complex than what you proposed. Fewer knobs to try
to understand.
Received on Wednesday, 19 February 2014 22:48:38 UTC