W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-orca@w3.org > February 2014

Re: A Big Proposal: A way to control quality/resolution/framreate/simulcast/layering with RtpSender

From: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 11:26:43 -0800
Message-ID: <CAJrXDUEA+1595CfzknNPaNpKKdpYg0Cg31wW0HfOX=2hFt3yiw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: Chris Wendt <chris-w3c@chriswendt.net>, "public-orca@w3.org" <public-orca@w3.org>
Can you describe this as a use case?


On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>wrote:

> On 19 February 2014 07:15, Chris Wendt <chris-w3c@chriswendt.net> wrote:
> > I don’t believe there shouldn’t be aspirations of having a priority or
> > frame-rate vs quality parameters meaning anything explicit, with any
> > expected outcome other than a “preference" that guides the underlying
> > implementation to “try" to conform to.
>
> That's a reasonable starting point.  If this were:
>
> priority: 0.5,   // give half the resources of something with priority 1
> preferences: {
>   scale: 1, // don't downsample if you please
>   framerate: 30, // keep the frame rate here
>   quality: // I have no idea what metric we should be using here
>             // (0..1 where 0 = 0 bits and 1 = all the bits?)
> }
>
Received on Wednesday, 19 February 2014 19:27:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:39:24 UTC