- From: Martin Alvarez-Espinar <martin.alvarez@fundacionctic.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 10:08:34 +0000
- To: public-opentrack <public-opentrack@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAL8AgZRgXOFtP90mZNQbUVYLGQpmt5oAYzU4T7nfxgKbBcwbKg@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks for your time today. Please, find the minutes I took during the conference at https://github.com/w3c/opentrack-cg/wiki/Meeting-2017-11-29 Best, Martin On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 5:33 PM Martin Alvarez-Espinar < martin.alvarez@fundacionctic.org> wrote: > Dear all, > > This is the reminder of our weekly meeting. As always, you can connect > using this URL: https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/110180797 and see > more logistic details on the wiki [1]. > > I included on the agenda the *Schema.org proposal* topic that I want to > discuss with you. At least check your opinion before publishing anything. > > I've created a draft extension proposal for schema.org to cover our > requirements. > * It includes the properties and entities defined in the abstract model > and missing in the core schema. > * The proposed new terms are based on the existing ones (subClasses or > subProperties). > * It also includes some top entities that can be used for other purposes > (for instance, SportsDiscipline or SportsCategory). > * The draft version is deployed on: > http://athletics.sdo-athletics.appspot.com/ > > My question is if we should continue with this schema.org proposal, or > just be focused on document properly the version Reporlab created and > publish examples? Both? > > Talk to you soon, > > Martin > > [1] https://github.com/w3c/opentrack-cg/wiki/Meeting-2017-11-22 > > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 22 November 2017 10:09:08 UTC