W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-opentrack@w3.org > November 2017

Re: Meeting 22 Nov (09:00 UTC)

From: Martin Alvarez-Espinar <martin.alvarez@fundacionctic.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 10:08:34 +0000
Message-ID: <CAL8AgZRgXOFtP90mZNQbUVYLGQpmt5oAYzU4T7nfxgKbBcwbKg@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-opentrack <public-opentrack@w3.org>
Thanks for your time today. Please, find the minutes I took during the
conference at https://github.com/w3c/opentrack-cg/wiki/Meeting-2017-11-29

Best,

Martin

On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 5:33 PM Martin Alvarez-Espinar <
martin.alvarez@fundacionctic.org> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> This is the reminder of our weekly meeting. As always, you can connect
> using this URL: https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/110180797 and see
> more logistic details on the wiki [1].
>
> I included on the agenda the *Schema.org proposal* topic that I want to
> discuss with you. At least check your opinion before publishing anything.
>
> I've created a draft extension proposal for schema.org to cover our
> requirements.
> * It includes the properties and entities defined in the abstract model
> and missing in the core schema.
> * The proposed new terms are based on the existing ones (subClasses or
> subProperties).
> * It also includes some top entities that can be used for other purposes
> (for instance, SportsDiscipline or SportsCategory).
> * The draft version is deployed on:
> http://athletics.sdo-athletics.appspot.com/
>
> My question is if we should continue with this schema.org proposal, or
> just be focused on document properly the version Reporlab created and
> publish examples? Both?
>
> Talk to you soon,
>
> Martin
>
> [1] https://github.com/w3c/opentrack-cg/wiki/Meeting-2017-11-22
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 22 November 2017 10:09:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 22 November 2017 10:09:09 UTC