W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-opentrack@w3.org > November 2017

Meeting 22 Nov (09:00 UTC)

From: Martin Alvarez-Espinar <martin.alvarez@fundacionctic.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 16:33:28 +0000
Message-ID: <CAL8AgZSZsav5sfqhRfyMT7YJrC+__0KHeTzmMYFUN-j+fYc=YQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-opentrack <public-opentrack@w3.org>
Dear all,

This is the reminder of our weekly meeting. As always, you can connect
using this URL: https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/110180797 and see more
logistic details on the wiki [1].

I included on the agenda the *Schema.org proposal* topic that I want to
discuss with you. At least check your opinion before publishing anything.

I've created a draft extension proposal for schema.org to cover our
requirements.
* It includes the properties and entities defined in the abstract model and
missing in the core schema.
* The proposed new terms are based on the existing ones (subClasses or
subProperties).
* It also includes some top entities that can be used for other purposes
(for instance, SportsDiscipline or SportsCategory).
* The draft version is deployed on:
http://athletics.sdo-athletics.appspot.com/

My question is if we should continue with this schema.org proposal, or just
be focused on document properly the version Reporlab created and publish
examples? Both?

Talk to you soon,

Martin

[1] https://github.com/w3c/opentrack-cg/wiki/Meeting-2017-11-22
Received on Monday, 20 November 2017 16:34:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 20 November 2017 16:34:10 UTC