- From: Martin Alvarez-Espinar <martin.alvarez@fundacionctic.org>
- Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 16:33:28 +0000
- To: public-opentrack <public-opentrack@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 20 November 2017 16:34:09 UTC
Dear all, This is the reminder of our weekly meeting. As always, you can connect using this URL: https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/110180797 and see more logistic details on the wiki [1]. I included on the agenda the *Schema.org proposal* topic that I want to discuss with you. At least check your opinion before publishing anything. I've created a draft extension proposal for schema.org to cover our requirements. * It includes the properties and entities defined in the abstract model and missing in the core schema. * The proposed new terms are based on the existing ones (subClasses or subProperties). * It also includes some top entities that can be used for other purposes (for instance, SportsDiscipline or SportsCategory). * The draft version is deployed on: http://athletics.sdo-athletics.appspot.com/ My question is if we should continue with this schema.org proposal, or just be focused on document properly the version Reporlab created and publish examples? Both? Talk to you soon, Martin [1] https://github.com/w3c/opentrack-cg/wiki/Meeting-2017-11-22
Received on Monday, 20 November 2017 16:34:09 UTC