- From: Graham Klyne <gklyne@googlemail.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 22:04:55 +0100
- To: sgharms@stevengharms.com
- Cc: public-openannotation@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CALu85rUJKBwXM=GkbRp4i=y4JkTMJKHJoSUkiEy_zdeXnVqSmg@mail.gmail.com>
I'm currently doing some linked data work using Web Annotations applied to physical places, and I'm not seeing any real problems with this (just a need to be clear what a URI is referring to). I'm actually finding them to be quite a powerful tool for capturing contextualised descriptions in linked data (with a modest additions). #g. On Wed, 10 Oct 2018, 21:46 Steven Harms, <sgharms@stevengharms.com> wrote: > Greetings, > > I am interested in creating annotations on physical books [1 > <https://stevengharms.com/research/semweb-topic/problem_statement/>]. > > As the name "web annotations" suggests, the default target of the Web > Annotation Working Group would be, of course, to annotation IRI-referable > targets with IRI-identifiable Annotations. > > 1. Is there a model whereby we could point to a physical resource in a URI > / IRI format (and thus join the existing Web Annotation universe, *or* > 2. Is there a framework that might support referring to physical books > that I've simply not found > 3. Or should I plan to use JSON-LD to create "forge my own path?" > > I hope to post an example of what #3 might look like, but I'd like to > double check my understanding before engaging in in such an effort, *tabula > rasa*. > > Regards, > > Steven > > > [1]: https://stevengharms.com/research/semweb-topic/problem_statement/ > > -- > Steven G. Harms > PGP: E6052DAF > <https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x337AF45BE6052DAF> >
Received on Wednesday, 10 October 2018 21:05:30 UTC