- From: Bob Morris <morris.bob@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2014 15:43:28 -0500
- To: "Cole, Timothy W" <t-cole3@illinois.edu>
- Cc: public-openannotation <public-openannotation@w3.org>
The Schrödinger's Cat issue is very interesting in another use case likely to rear its head, possibly more aggressively, for document annotation in any context requiring dialogues between annotation producer and consumer. For resource quality control annotations, such dialogues may be common, e.g. between a resource editor and the resource author. (editor: "The author mis-uses 'kitten' for 'cat' throughout and it should be changed" ; author: "I decline to change it. Instead, I have added to revision 2 a paragraph explaining that on the planet Vogon, not cats live to adulthood.") The problem is that an annotation <A> can easily refer to an annotation <B> that does not exist, but which is expected to refer to <A>. If <B> eventually has the box opened and it proves to be a response to <A>, the annotation dialogue graph (given by "<X> responds to <Y>" ) may have cycles in it. This causes issues with SPARQL queries, although SPARQL 1.1 addresses them [1]. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/#propertypath-arbitrary-length Bob On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Tim Cole <t-cole3@illinois.edu> wrote: > >[...] > > A relevant question (I think) is whether (in the context of RDF and OA) we > can unambiguously give identity as a single Resource (e.g., as an extension > of the oa:SpecificResource class) to what is essentially a not yet > enumerated ad hoc aggregation of oa:SpecificResources? Perhaps there's a > bit of a Schrödinger's Cat issue lurking here. > > > -- Robert A. Morris Emeritus Professor of Computer Science UMASS-Boston 100 Morrissey Blvd Boston, MA 02125-3390 Filtered Push Project Harvard University Herbaria Harvard University email: morris.bob@gmail.com web: http://efg.cs.umb.edu/ web: http://wiki.filteredpush.org http://www.cs.umb.edu/~ram === The content of this communication is made entirely on my own behalf and in no way should be deemed to express official positions of The University of Massachusetts at Boston or Harvard University.
Received on Saturday, 1 March 2014 20:43:56 UTC