Re: W3C Annotation Working Group?

Hi Robert, Paolo, all,

You probably have more than enough +1 but still, add mine too!
Unfortunately, the University I am with is not a member of W3C. Still, I
would like to contribute to this group. Would be through the community
group and the mailing list the way in this case? I am always happy to
collaborate with examples, diagrams, and use cases.

Regards,
Leyla Jael


On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Nick Stenning <nick@whiteink.com> wrote:

> > On Jan 8, 2014, at 11:52 AM, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Please let us know your thoughts on this idea!  While we think that a
> formal TR will carry significantly more weight than the current community
> draft, especially with larger industrial potential adopters, and that a
> broader scope of work can strengthen the market, we want to make sure you
> agree that the creation of a WG is the right thing to do at this stage. Do
> you think this is the right step? Would you be interested in participating
> in this proposed WG? Please give us your comments here!
> >
>
> To echo the sentiments of the many others who have already contributed
> to this discussion, I'd be delighted to see this happen. We in the
> Annotator project are thrilled to see how many people are interested in
> Open Annotation, and under your stewardship, Rob and Paolo, I see great
> things ahead.
>
> Of course, I'll be happy to help out in any way I can.
>
> Best,
> Nick
>
>