On 16 Jan 2014, at 15:24 , Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net> wrote: > > On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:42:59 -0700, Robert Sanderson wrote: >> That said ... if W3C were to issue a JSON-LD context for the RDFA core >> mappings, then we could inherit it as a best practice. That would provide > a >> substantive benefit, both in terms of understanding and reducing the need >> for dereferencing of resources. > > That has already been done. I've created the context a while ago at > > https://gist.github.com/lanthaler/5056140 > > and it has been uploaded to > > http://www.w3.org/2013/json-ld-context/rdfa11 > > It would probably be worth mentioning that directly on > > http://www.w3.org/2011/rdfa-context/rdfa-1.1 > > so that people will actually find it. Serving it directly at that URL (using > conneg) would be great as well. > Actually, I did that as well. Both http://www.w3.org/2011/rdfa-context/rdfa-1.1.json and http://www.w3.org/2011/rdfa-context/rdfa-1.1.jsonld refer that file through redirection. Ivan > > P.S.: Thanks Ivan for bringing this to my attention > > > Cheers, > Markus > > > -- > Markus Lanthaler > @markuslanthaler > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Digital Publishing Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 GPG: 0x343F1A3D FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf
Received on Thursday, 16 January 2014 14:44:43 UTC