- From: Paolo Ciccarese <paolo.ciccarese@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 19:38:42 -0500
- To: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Bob Morris <morris.bob@gmail.com>, public-openannotation <public-openannotation@w3.org>, W3C Public Annotation List <public-annotation@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFPX2kCdfk7QV7SkmBE-gca2DSMpgug85G4+1y=R24pcWpo89Q@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Doug, Bob, all, in the current Open Annotation model - and that was true for Open Annotation Collaboration and Annotation Ontology models - the data annotation is supported and an important aspect of the overall idea. For instance we can have a selector that is able to identify a portion of a dataset through an appropriate mechanisms (even a SQL query if necessary). Doug, data selectors don't change the need for robust anchoring within the web documents realm, it is simply a different aspect. The concern is to have a new model that will somehow preclude/limit that. That would be a problem for instance for the scientific community where data curation can be addressed with annotation. Best, Paolo On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org> wrote: > Hi, Bob- > > The Force11 Data Citation Principles are interesting, and I certainly > support them; they seem very much in line with TimBL's thinking about > Linked Open Data and "five-star data". > > While I agree with Ivan that we need to keep a focused scope, I'm curious > what specifically you would like to see in the charter? > > Much of the Force11 Data Citation Principles seem to be about publishing > guidelines or citation guidelines, not annotations per se. Are you > suggesting that the robust anchoring try to address data citation as well > as document anchoring? Or is there some other way in which "data" could be > more explicitly in scope? > > Regards- > -Doug > > > On 2/4/14 11:53 AM, Ivan Herman wrote: > >> >> On 04 Feb 2014, at 16:28 , Bob Morris <morris.bob@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> This is good news and I add my thanks. >>> >>> It will be no surprise to OA followers that only problem I have >>> with the early draft is that it does not unambiguously put data >>> annotation in the scope. This is all the more disappointing given >>> the quite interesting efforts that Tim and Ivan have pointed out >>> in public-openannotation@w3.org about data citation practices, >>> e.g. http://force11.org/datacitation, in the context of increasing >>> pressure from funding agencies to provide the data behind the >>> conclusions of scientific publications. >>> >> >> Bob, >> >> obviously:-) I am aware of the data publishing issues. And I think it >> is correct to say that part of the work that is planned in the group >> (namely the finalization of the data model) would certainly be usable >> for data annotation as well. >> >> However... the work on API-s, RESTful or not, would, I believe, be >> very different when we talk about annotation on data and about >> annotation on web pages or digital books. And the sad reality is that >> we have to make a choice in the scope because we cannot cover >> everything in one place. Hence the current focus on the 'traditional' >> Web issues. >> >> That being said: we are certainly open to either enlarge the scope >> or, possibly at a later point, spawn a different group with a >> different scope that would look at the annotation of data publishing. >> It is a matter of 'submissions' in the general sense, a maturity of >> the technology in terms of a possible standardization, communities >> that are ready to step up... Let us see where the public discussion >> goes! >> >> Thanks! >> >> Ivan >> >> >>> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Paolo Ciccarese >>> <paolo.ciccarese@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Dear Community Group Members, As anticipated W3C may start a >>>> Working Group to standardize the major building blocks for >>>> annotations. >>>> >>>> Thanks to the work of Ivan Herman and Doug Schepers, an 'advance >>>> notice' has been issued to the W3C members[1] and a very early >>>> draft for the Working Group Charter [2] has been made available >>>> publicly. >>>> >>>> Any comments are welcome to finalize the draft. The best is to >>>> send them to the public-annotation@w3.org mailing list whose role >>>> is to collect all the comments coming from the community at >>>> large. >>>> >>>> Best, Paolo & Rob >>>> >>>> [1] >>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-annotation/2014Feb/0000.html >>>> >>>> >>>> [2] http://www.w3.org/2014/01/Ann-charter.html > >> >>>> -- Dr. Paolo Ciccarese http://www.paolociccarese.info/ Biomedical >>>> Informatics Research & Development Instructor of Neurology at >>>> Harvard Medical School Assistant in Neuroscience at Mass General >>>> Hospital Member of the MGH Biomedical Informatics Core >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- Robert A. Morris >>> >>> Emeritus Professor of Computer Science UMASS-Boston 100 Morrissey >>> Blvd Boston, MA 02125-3390 >>> >>> >>> Filtered Push Project Harvard University Herbaria Harvard >>> University >>> >>> email: morris.bob@gmail.com web: http://efg.cs.umb.edu/ web: >>> http://wiki.filteredpush.org http://www.cs.umb.edu/~ram === The >>> content of this communication is made entirely on my own behalf and >>> in no way should be deemed to express official positions of The >>> University of Massachusetts at Boston or Harvard University. >>> >> >> >> ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Digital Publishing Activity Lead Home: >> http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 GPG: 0x343F1A3D >> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf >> >> >> >> >> >> > > -- Dr. Paolo Ciccarese http://www.paolociccarese.info/ Biomedical Informatics Research & Development Instructor of Neurology at Harvard Medical School Assistant in Neuroscience at Mass General Hospital Member of the MGH Biomedical Informatics Core +1-857-366-1524 (mobile) +1-617-768-8744 (office) CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message is intended only for the addressee(s), may contain information that is considered to be sensitive or confidential and may not be forwarded or disclosed to any other party without the permission of the sender. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately.
Received on Wednesday, 5 February 2014 00:39:12 UTC