- From: Bob Morris <morris.bob@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 12:39:16 -0500
- To: public-openannotation <public-openannotation@w3.org>
I (think that I ) have a use case best described as conforming to two orthogonal specs. The Feb 8 core is silent on multiple conformsTo. Since there is(?) no machine semantics for conformsTo, multiples seem harmless. But possibly the OA spec should be more explicit because the explanatory text in Sec 3.2.1 speaks of "the" standard: "Clients MUST process the value of the FragmentSelector based on the standard that it conforms to". If multiples are permitted, then in case the conformance specs conflict, it may be necessary to allow the oa:List or rdf:List o provide the order of application of the processing guided by the conformance specs and remind the reader of its necessity. Bob -- Robert A. Morris Emeritus Professor of Computer Science UMASS-Boston 100 Morrissey Blvd Boston, MA 02125-3390 IT Staff Filtered Push Project Harvard University Herbaria Harvard University email: morris.bob@gmail.com web: http://efg.cs.umb.edu/ web: http://wiki.filteredpush.org http://www.cs.umb.edu/~ram === The content of this communication is made entirely on my own behalf and in no way should be deemed to express official positions of The University of Massachusetts at Boston or Harvard University.
Received on Wednesday, 6 March 2013 17:39:50 UTC