Re: whine about dctypes:Software

Hi Bob,
we have been discussing that issues when we picked that type
and we felt a little uncomfortable as well.

In the past, personally, I've been extending FOAF with some classes and
properties.
That is the other option I see. It would be our class though.

Paolo

On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 1:10 AM, Bob Morris <morris.bob@gmail.com> wrote:

> I guess this issue is in the current core also.
>
> In http://www.openannotation.org/spec/future/core.html#ProvAgents it
> is proposed that dctypes:Software be used to type a software agent.
> One problem is that dctypesSoftware is not a subtype of foaf:Agent,
> thereby requiring(?) that a foaf:Agent type also be asserted on any
> Agent of type dctype:Software.
>
> I don't find this inherently improper, but I'm uncomfortable about an
> asymmetry between the Person and Software cases. I don't have a better
> idea though, and wonder why the FOAF community hasn't offered such a
> subclass.
>
> We also would often need to have Software as the object of
> oa:annotatedBy.  In addition to humans, we have Kepler workflows
> producing annotations autonomously.
>
> Bob Morris
>
> --
> Robert A. Morris
>
> Emeritus Professor  of Computer Science
> UMASS-Boston
> 100 Morrissey Blvd
> Boston, MA 02125-3390
>
> IT Staff
> Filtered Push Project
> Harvard University Herbaria
> Harvard University
>
> email: morris.bob@gmail.com
> web: http://efg.cs.umb.edu/
> web: http://etaxonomy.org/mw/FilteredPush
> http://www.cs.umb.edu/~ram
> ===
> The content of this communication is made entirely on my
> own behalf and in no way should be deemed to express
> official positions of The University of Massachusetts at Boston or
> Harvard University.
>
>


-- 
Dr. Paolo Ciccarese
http://www.paolociccarese.info/
Biomedical Informatics Research & Development
Instructor of Neurology at Harvard Medical School
Assistant in Neuroscience at Mass General Hospital
+1-857-366-1524 (mobile)   +1-617-768-8744 (office)

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message is intended only for the addressee(s),
may contain information that is considered
to be sensitive or confidential and may not be forwarded or disclosed to
any other party without the permission of the sender.
If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender
immediately.

Received on Friday, 11 January 2013 14:57:37 UTC