- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 11:30:38 +0100
- To: <public-openannotation@w3.org>
On 2/7/13 11:27 AM, Ivan Herman wrote: > > On Feb 7, 2013, at 10:59 , Antoine Isaac<aisaac@few.vu.nl> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Not sure I'm going to deliver crucial input, but in case, here are my two cents. >> >> - I find shorter namespaces good, and I wouldn't mind using 'oa' even if it means sthg else--first come fist serve, and it matches what other vocabularies at W3C seem to be doing. Worst case, if the group prefers a meaningful label, I'd prefer /annotation/ over /openannotation/. I suppose 'open' does not add much info in the context of a W3C namespace. Such a change would also tell something about the maturity and ambition of the initiative :-) >> >> - I like 'core', but that because I still would prefer the current namespace to be broken down (especially, the motivation instances could go to their own sub-space). >> If the modules defined in the namespace (like 'annotation/core') do not match the modules in the spec documentation, it may be counter productive. Which makes me realize that we've got a "core of a "core",, which is a bit awkward: >> http://www.openannotation.org/spec/core/core.html >> But I suppose we can make it disappear when the HTML also moves to another place. >> >> Side question: Ivan, Phil, would it be possible to have a core in http://www.w3.org/ns/openannotation/ and later extensions in say, http://www.w3.org/ns/openannotation/ext/? Or would it ruin your dreams of simple maintenance of the namespace? >> > > Well... this is again the # vs. / question. > > Having > > http://www.w3.org/ns/annotation/core#BLABLA > http://www.w3.org/ns/annotation/ext1#BLABLA > > is of course no problem. Having '/' means a file per term, which means the maintenance costs become higher. Whether that is spread over several directories is of course not a real difference. It will be the number of terms that will count (in contrast to the number of extensions in the case of a '#' approach). Sorry Ivan I've been unclear--and typed one slash too many. I meant: http://www.w3.org/ns/annotation#BLABLA http://www.w3.org/ns/annotation/ext1#BLABLA Antoine
Received on Thursday, 7 February 2013 10:31:07 UTC