W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-openannotation@w3.org > February 2013

Re: New Specification Published!

From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 10:41:35 +0000
Message-ID: <CAPRnXtnL=EOM+Lq8gXjPeZR=Npm5qKQ6ykZJbdqcdZc+dZ1FNw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>
Cc: public-openannotation <public-openannotation@w3.org>, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
Yes, http://www.w3.org/ns/openannotation/core/ and
http://www.w3.org/ns/openannotation/core/* should not give a 404.. at
least now that we are in a way going to be calling for
implementations.

Are we able to do a redirect to our RDFS/OWL (has it been updated?),
or do we hand it to W3C for publication?


On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com> wrote:
> Congratulations on the new spec! The level of discussion and
> collaboration around openannoation has been really impressive.
>
> I apologize if this has come up before, but is there a plan to move
> the vocabulary over into the w3c namespace? I happened to have a
> conversation with Phil Archer at the w3c last week who (correct me if
> I'm wrong here Phil) indicated that this is a service that the w3c has
> been thinking about offering for community groups. The idea being that
> a vocabulary could have a persistent home at the w3c. Also, I think a
> w3c namespace for openannotation would lend the vocabulary some
> additional credibility outside the digital library domain.
>
> I thought I would ask now, as we can expect more openannotation
> implementations in the near future :-)
>
> //Ed
>
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Firstly, thank you all so much for your hard work and engagement in
>> this process. We could not have gotten to this point without this
>> fantastic community. So it is with great pride that we announce the
>> publication of the next version of the Open Annotation specification:
>>
>>     http://www.openannotation.org/spec/core/
>>
>> This replaces the previous version of May 9th, 2012 and is (of course)
>> the version that we have been discussing at /spec/future/
>>
>> There may be minor typos left which were not caught. Please let us
>> know if you find any and we'll fix them, but any further changes to
>> the actual data model will have to wait to go through the next round
>> of feedback and revision.
>>
>> Many thanks,
>>
>> Rob and Paolo
>>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Firstly, thank you all so much for your hard work and engagement in
>> this process. We could not have gotten to this point without this
>> fantastic community. So it is with great pride that we announce the
>> publication of the next version of the Open Annotation specification:
>>
>>     http://www.openannotation.org/spec/core/
>>
>> This replaces the previous version of May 9th, 2012 and is (of course)
>> the version that we have been discussing at /spec/future/
>>
>> There may be minor typos left which were not caught. Please let us
>> know if you find any and we'll fix them, but any further changes to
>> the actual data model will have to wait to go through the next round
>> of feedback and revision.
>>
>> Many thanks,
>>
>> Rob and Paolo
>>
>



-- 
Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team
School of Computer Science
The University of Manchester
Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2013 10:42:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:38:22 UTC