- From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 10:41:35 +0000
- To: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>
- Cc: public-openannotation <public-openannotation@w3.org>, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
Yes, http://www.w3.org/ns/openannotation/core/ and http://www.w3.org/ns/openannotation/core/* should not give a 404.. at least now that we are in a way going to be calling for implementations. Are we able to do a redirect to our RDFS/OWL (has it been updated?), or do we hand it to W3C for publication? On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com> wrote: > Congratulations on the new spec! The level of discussion and > collaboration around openannoation has been really impressive. > > I apologize if this has come up before, but is there a plan to move > the vocabulary over into the w3c namespace? I happened to have a > conversation with Phil Archer at the w3c last week who (correct me if > I'm wrong here Phil) indicated that this is a service that the w3c has > been thinking about offering for community groups. The idea being that > a vocabulary could have a persistent home at the w3c. Also, I think a > w3c namespace for openannotation would lend the vocabulary some > additional credibility outside the digital library domain. > > I thought I would ask now, as we can expect more openannotation > implementations in the near future :-) > > //Ed > > On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com> wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> Firstly, thank you all so much for your hard work and engagement in >> this process. We could not have gotten to this point without this >> fantastic community. So it is with great pride that we announce the >> publication of the next version of the Open Annotation specification: >> >> http://www.openannotation.org/spec/core/ >> >> This replaces the previous version of May 9th, 2012 and is (of course) >> the version that we have been discussing at /spec/future/ >> >> There may be minor typos left which were not caught. Please let us >> know if you find any and we'll fix them, but any further changes to >> the actual data model will have to wait to go through the next round >> of feedback and revision. >> >> Many thanks, >> >> Rob and Paolo >> > > > On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com> wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> Firstly, thank you all so much for your hard work and engagement in >> this process. We could not have gotten to this point without this >> fantastic community. So it is with great pride that we announce the >> publication of the next version of the Open Annotation specification: >> >> http://www.openannotation.org/spec/core/ >> >> This replaces the previous version of May 9th, 2012 and is (of course) >> the version that we have been discussing at /spec/future/ >> >> There may be minor typos left which were not caught. Please let us >> know if you find any and we'll fix them, but any further changes to >> the actual data model will have to wait to go through the next round >> of feedback and revision. >> >> Many thanks, >> >> Rob and Paolo >> > -- Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team School of Computer Science The University of Manchester
Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2013 10:42:24 UTC