Re: ? best practice about extending motivations

I see nothing un-skos in Bob's statements!
See
http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-primer/#secextension
for some patterns.

Antoine



>
> I think the question is about best practices on publishing SKOS ConceptSchemes? Antoine, and all, is there something we can point to in this regard from the spec appendix?
>
> Personally, I don't think there's a need to include all of the information in every annotation, but it might be valuable to include the link to the ConceptScheme so it can be dereferenced if that's desirable.
>
> Rob
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Bob Morris <morris.bob@gmail.com <mailto:morris.bob@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     I'm finding a need for what appear to be somewhat annotation specific
>     motivations, typically more specific than one of the standard ones or
>     a few application-specific motivations. Typically these are
>     text-based and not reusable, so the solution seems to add a local one,
>     e.g.:
>
>     =============================
>     ex:anno a oa:Annotation;
>     oa:motivatedBy oa:editing;
>     oa:motivatedBy ex:myMotivation;
>     ....
>
>     ex:myMotivation a oa:Motivation;
>     skos:inScheme ex:myScheme;
>     skos:prefLabel "Integrate data found on the lab spreadsheet into the
>     database."
>
>     ...
>
>     ex:myScheme ....
>     =============================
>
>     Somehow having a skos concept and scheme local to the annotation seems
>     very un-skos-like, but I don't see what else to do.
>
>     Bob
>
>
>
>
>
>     --
>     Robert A. Morris
>
>     Emeritus Professor of Computer Science
>     UMASS-Boston
>     100 Morrissey Blvd
>     Boston, MA 02125-3390
>
>     IT Staff
>     Filtered Push Project
>     Harvard University Herbaria
>     Harvard University
>
>     email: morris.bob@gmail.com <mailto:morris.bob@gmail.com>
>     web: http://efg.cs.umb.edu/
>     web: http://wiki.filteredpush.org
>     http://www.cs.umb.edu/~ram
>     ===
>     The content of this communication is made entirely on my
>     own behalf and in no way should be deemed to express
>     official positions of The University of Massachusetts at Boston or
>     Harvard University.
>
>

Received on Thursday, 11 April 2013 20:04:05 UTC