- From: Randall Leeds <randall.leeds@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 16:03:28 -0700
- To: Bob Morris <morris.bob@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-openannotation <public-openannotation@w3.org>
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Bob Morris <morris.bob@gmail.com> wrote: > In http://www.w3.org/community/openannotation/wiki/Annotating_Resource-in-Context_Proposals > many of the examples put cnt:chars on the Body, thereby making it a > cnt:ContentAsText class by inference. (That's the domain of > cnt:chars.) Normally, I don't like domains and typing by inference > via domains, but it seems pretty harmless here and is rather concise. > > Have we anywhere explicitly blessed using cnt at all? It seems like a > good idea here, but I can't explain why I'm a little nervous. Still, > if we adopted it at least as a best practice, applications annotators > can, of they choose always(?) be able to produce something that a > consuming application can present to humans without much advance > understanding of the domain vocabulary of the Body details. http://openannotation.org/spec/core/#Inline
Received on Friday, 7 September 2012 23:03:56 UTC