- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 10:31:45 -0400
- To: public-openannotation@w3.org
Posting this here, to followup on discussions about capturing (or not) HTTP headers as part of annotation process http://browserspy.dk/ "Welcome to BrowserSpy.dk. BrowserSpy.dk is the place where you can see just how much information your browser reveals about you and your system." http://privacyandtechnology.tumblr.com/post/17602901757/ralph-broenink-using-browser-properties-for "Ralph Broenink | Using browser properties for fingerprinting purposes (PDF)" "“It is widely known that cookies can be used to track users. However, even privacy-aware users are trackable by the properties the browser sends with every request. Based on information like the browser vendor, plugin versions and the installed fonts, a fingerprint may be created that uniquely identies a browser.”" https://panopticlick.eff.org "Is your browser configuration rare or unique? If so, web sites may be able to track you, even if you limit or disable cookies. Panopticlick tests your browser to see how unique it is based on the information it will share with sites it visits. Click below and you will be given a uniqueness score, letting you see how easily identifiable you might be as you surf the web. Only anonymous data will be collected by this site." I just tried it. Results: "Your browser fingerprint appears to be unique among the 2,086,438 tested so far. Currently, we estimate that your browser has a fingerprint that conveys at least 20.99 bits of identifying information." Dan
Received on Friday, 16 March 2012 14:32:22 UTC