Re: Style from Randall Leeds on 2012-07-31 (public-openannotation@w3.org from July 2012)

From: Randall Leeds <randall.leeds@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 12:03:00 -0700
To: Paolo Ciccarese <paolo.ciccarese@gmail.com>
Cc: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>, public-openannotation <public-openannotation@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAAL6JQhBVQU2HzY4eM3W+8Xn=UgyK3W3afJ0JJua6PGw9eT03g@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 4:49 AM, Paolo Ciccarese
<paolo.ciccarese@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I believe this new approach is cleaner and more practical for reusing
> Specific Resources without merging the presentation layer with the actual
> resource. A big +1
>
> IhasState has a tighter relationships with the resource. In fact the
> hasState should be necessary to retrieve the correct representation of the
> resource  so that the annotation can be placed correctly - while the style
> was purely related to the presentation of the annotation. I am sure there
> are cases where you can ignore hasState and still place the annotation but I
> would not feel safe in saying that would be the norm. Therefore hasState
> seems more belonging to  the Specific Resource.

+1. Well defended.

Received on Tuesday, 31 July 2012 19:03:27 UTC