>
>
>>
>>
>> > That is why I'm currently doing:
>> > <_:Anno1> a oa:Annotation ;
>> > oa:hasSource <_:Body1> ;
>> > oa:hasTarget <_:SpecificResource1> ;
>> > oa:hasTarget <_:SpecificResource2> ;
>> > pundit:hasPageContext <http://example.org/page/1.html> .
>>
>> To be honest, I think that's fine! It seems like a particular piece of
>> information that your client can create and then use, without
>> affecting anything else. Other systems will simply ignore the
>> hasPageContext relationship unless they also know what it means.
>>
>
>
> Agree. Maybe we should open a page in the Wiki with 'other properites'
> that real implemented systems currently use.
> Then we can evaluate when to move some of those in the extension/core.
>
>
> Christian, would you mind editing the Wiki page where I included the
pundit property?
http://www.w3.org/community/openannotation/wiki/Incubator#Open_Annotation_Community_Group_Incubator
Paolo