Re: no reference to skos?

On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Paolo Ciccarese <paolo.ciccarese@gmail.com
> wrote:

> Reto,
> I am assuming you are referring to the Open Annotation Model and not to
> the Annotation Ontology.
>
I was refering to the ontology described in the document titled "Open
Annotation Core Data Model".

>
> I have been using occasionally SKOS terms in medical applications.
> However, most of the tags/concepts we use come from ontologies that are not
> necessarily associated to SKOS. In general, the property oax:hasSemanticTag
> (http://www.openannotation.org/spec/extension/#SemanticTag) is meant to
> be used to point to a non-information resource, skos or not.
>
Ok, thanks. I'll be using this then.

Reto


>
> Paolo
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <reto@apache.org>wrote:
>
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> the tag uri is that the uri of the object of oa:hasBody?
>>
>> I find it rather confusing with this property that can both point to an
>> information resource like some text and to a non-information resource like
>> a concept, but in real world ambiguity tends to work.
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Reto
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Reto,
>>>
>>> We could add a note saying that adopters may wish to consider
>>> skos:Concept for a tag URI, but was there something more that you were
>>> thinking about here?
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Rob
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <reto@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hello,
>>> >
>>> > Looking at the annotation ontology I'm surprised not to find any
>>> reference
>>> > to SKOS. Isn't linking document section to the concept they relate to a
>>> > prototypical usage scenario for annotations?
>>> >
>>> > Cheers,
>>> > Reto
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Dr. Paolo Ciccarese
> http://www.paolociccarese.info/
> Biomedical Informatics Research & Development
> Instructor of Neurology at Harvard Medical School
> Assistant in Neuroscience at Mass General Hospital
> +1-857-366-1524 (mobile)   +1-617-768-8744 (office)
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message is intended only for the
> addressee(s), may contain information that is considered
> to be sensitive or confidential and may not be forwarded or disclosed to
> any other party without the permission of the sender.
> If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender
> immediately.
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 17 July 2012 19:32:10 UTC