Re: lime:language vs. dct:language in OntoLex

Hi all,

I added an answer on GitHub issue describing the use in DBnary (and its reasons) and my position.

Regards,

Gilles,

> On 10 Jun 2023, at 02:37, Christian Chiarcos <christian.chiarcos@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Dear OntoLex community,
> 
> in a discussion with Manuel Fiorelli, we recently spotted an issue with the core diagram, in that it seems to suggest a property "ontolex:language" where the text uses "dct:language" (core section) and "lime:language"/"dct:language" (lime section), instead.
> 
> Details under https://github.com/ontolex/ontolex/issues/37 <https://github.com/ontolex/ontolex/issues/37>.
> 
> The least invasive fix is to replace "language" in the diagram with the correct properties. My preference on that is to use "dct:language" (as in the examples in core section). Alternatively, we might give both "dct:language" and "lime:language" (I'd find that confusing for a first-time user) or "lime:language" only (this contradicts examples in core ... unless these are fixed). 
> 
> As there are three options, people in the community might want to discuss. My preference is to use `dct:language` here, only, because it doesn't require other changes in the text and doesn't confuse first-time users.
> 
> Best,
> Christian