- From: Manuel Fiorelli <manuel.fiorelli@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 08:10:00 +0100
- To: Elena montiel <emontiel@fi.upm.es>
- Cc: public-ontolex <public-ontolex@w3.org>, Jorge Gracia <jogracia@unizar.es>
- Message-ID: <CAGDmdGjJr5KxbHDC6xkX=xvf_LzxYyZZ7TD44QMvzARopdUhUw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Elena, thank you for your reply. I was interested in your proposal for translation categories, since we are developing a new *lexicographer view* inside VocBench [1], which will streamline the editing of OntoLex-Lemon lexicons, including the use of the *decomp *module and the representation of lexico-semantic relations. These features will be part of the next release, which will be announced in a few weeks. Best regards, Manuel 1. http://vocbench.uniroma2.it/ Il giorno sab 20 feb 2021 alle ore 07:49 Elena montiel <emontiel@fi.upm.es> ha scritto: > Dear Manuel, > > Thanks for rasing this issue. > > I 'cc Jorge Gracia. We are the authors of the this proposal for > translation categories. > > Let us come back to you asap. > > Best regards, > > Elena. > El 18/02/2021 a las 20:10, Manuel Fiorelli escribió: > > Dear all > > I write to this mailing list since I was unable to find any contact > information for the *translation-categories *ontology, while I suspect > that its authors might belong to the OntoLex Community Group. > > The problem is this. When I deference the the IRI *http://purl.org/net/translation-categories#directEquivalent > <http://purl.org/net/translation-categories#directEquivalent> *(which has > been used in the OntoLex specs), I obtain a Turtle file, of which I provide > an excerpt: > > > *<trcat:directEquivalent> * > > * rdfs:label "direct equivalent"@en ; rdfs:comment "Typically, the > two terms describe semantically equivalent entities that refer to entities > that exist in both cultures and languages. E.g., surrogate mother (EN) -> > mère porteuse (FR)"@en .* > > As you can see, the subject is *<trcat:directEquivalent>*, which is not a > prefixed name, but rather it is -- literally -- the URI > *trcat:directEquivalent*, which isn't probably what the authors had in > mind. > > In addition to fix this issue, I suggest to add an ontology node with > suitable metadata (including the contacts or the authors of the ontology) > and, why not?, register the ontology to Linked Open Vocabularies. > > Best regards, > Manuel Fiorelli > > -- > Elena Montiel-Ponsoda > > Applied Linguistics Department & > Ontology Engineering Group (OEG) > ETSI Informáticos > Universidad Politécnica de Madrid > c/Ciruelos, 2 > Boadilla del Monte-28660 Madrid, Españawww.oeg-upm.net > Tel. (+34) 91 336-3670/7414 > > > > <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> Libre > de virus. www.avast.com > <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> > <#m_6271199243375525021_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> > -- Manuel Fiorelli
Received on Monday, 22 February 2021 07:11:57 UTC