Re: lime:entry

Yes we can update it. I can run an informal poll over the list to make 
sure everyone agrees.

Philipp.

Am 08.02.21 um 10:51 schrieb John McCrae:
>
> Hi Manuel,
>
> If I remember correctly, you created this diagram, although I could be 
> wrong.
>
> At any rate, we note corrections to the specification here:
>
> https://github.com/ontolex/ontolex
>
> At some point (up to Philipp?), we should update the published version.
>
> Regards,
>
> John
>
> On 07/02/2021 17:13, Manuel Fiorelli wrote:
>> Hi Chiarcos, All
>>
>> I've looked at the diagram and confirm your finding. Additionally, I 
>> noticed that the box representing the class /lime:Lexicon /uses
>>
>>   * /ontolex:language/ which should be lime:language
>>   * /lime:linguisticModel/ which should be /lime:linguisticCatalog/
>>
>> In fact, I'm unsure whether we have a process to make this kind of 
>> corrections and publish a revision of the specifications.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Manuel
>>
>> Il giorno dom 7 feb 2021 alle ore 15:25 Christian Chiarcos 
>> <christian.chiarcos@web.de <mailto:christian.chiarcos@web.de>> ha 
>> scritto:
>>
>>     Dear all,
>>
>>     looking at https://www.w3.org/2016/05/ontolex/#metadata-lime
>>     <https://www.w3.org/2016/05/ontolex/#metadata-lime>, I realized
>>     that the property lime:entry is missing in the diagram.
>>
>>     Best,
>>     Christian
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Manuel Fiorelli

-- 
Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano
Head of Semantic Computing Group
Cognitive Interaction Technology Center (CITEC)
Faculty of Technology
Bielefeld University
Phone: +49 (0) 521 106 12249