- From: <mustafajarrar@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 23:07:14 +0300
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Cc: public-ontolex <public-ontolex@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CANnaCF_uT05Hv36s_S_Ya1BQt_=8+znDaY6dG27Anhzui0X6cA@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks Dan, The work on Wiki lexemes is also very relevant here. I appreciate any interest in this community for extending Schema.org with basic lexicographic data. Best Regards, --Mustafa On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 4:04 PM Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote: > You might look at recent developments over at Wikidata, > https://m.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Wikidata:Lexicographical_data > > On Wed, 3 Apr 2019, 13:18 , <mustafajarrar@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Dear OntoLex Members, >> >> It seems schema.org is not supporting lexicographic tags, and there are >> many dictionaries and lexicographic resources online that need to be >> supported. Do you know any initiative to extend schema.org in this >> direction? >> John referred me to this discussion >> <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-schemaorg/2016Nov/0039.html>, >> but it seems it was not continued. >> >> The case we currently have is to embed structured data inside the HTML >> (using RDFa or JOSN LD) for all lexical concepts and terms retrieved in our lexicographic >> search engine <https://ontology.birzeit.edu/term/attribute>. >> >> I believe much of the terminology developed in OntoLex is relevant here. Any >> suggestion or interest in this topic? >> >> Best Regards, >> --Mustafa >> >> ===================================================== >> *Mustafa Jarrar, PhD* >> Computer Science, Birzeit University, Palestine >> Page http://www.jarrar.info Arabic Ontology: >> https://ontology.birzeit.edu >> ===================================================== >> >>
Received on Sunday, 21 April 2019 20:07:53 UTC