- From: Julia Bosque Gil <jbosque@fi.upm.es>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 15:22:02 +0200
- To: Katrien Depuydt <Katrien.Depuydt@ivdnt.org>
- Cc: Ilan Kernerman <ilan@kdictionaries.com>, Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>, public-ontolex <public-ontolex@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+B92Mv9XZwzr6tjbR215CP3x_erWBrLtE52W4aghdOoxi1R9A@mail.gmail.com>
Dear all, I am available next Monday (11th) and the following week (18th). Best, Julia El lun., 4 jun. 2018 a las 12:42, Katrien Depuydt (< Katrien.Depuydt@ivdnt.org>) escribió: > Hi all, > > > > I am available next Monday, but the week after that as well. > > > > Kind regards, > > Katrien > > > > > Lic. Katrien Depuydt > senior onderzoeker/taalkundige > > senior researcher/linguist > > +31 (0)71 527 2479 +31 (0)6 53627318 / kamer 104 > > > > */instituut voor de Nederlandse taal/* > > Rapenburg 61 / 2311 GJ / Leiden > > Postbus 6515 / 2300 RA / Leiden > > > > ivdnt.org > > > > > > This message shall not constitute any obligations. > > This message is intended solely for the addressee. > If you have received this message in error, please > inform us and delete the message. > > > > *Van:* Ilan Kernerman [mailto:ilan@kdictionaries.com] > *Verzonden:* maandag 4 juni 2018 12:40 > *Aan:* Philipp Cimiano; public-ontolex@w3.org > *Onderwerp:* RE: citations etc > > > > I will not be available next week. My apologies. > > Ilan > > > > *From:* Philipp Cimiano [mailto:cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de > <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>] > *Sent:* Monday, June 04, 2018 1:32 PM > *To:* public-ontolex@w3.org > *Subject:* Re: citations etc > > > > Dear Fahad, > > if this is the case, then I propose we skip the teleconference today. > > It would be good to have you available to discuss your paper and the > definitions of attestation. > > I propose then we postpone to next week. I will not be available, but I > think it is more important that other players are available (Fahad, Ilan, > Katrien, etc.) > > Will John or Julia be available for chairing next week? > > Kind regards, > > Philipp. > > > > Am 04.06.18 um 12:23 schrieb Fahad Khan: > > Hi Philipp, > > I'm afraid I won't be able to attend today. > > Cheers, > Fahad > > > > On 4 June 2018 at 12:16, Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de> > wrote: > > Dear all, > > thanks for this Ilan. > > @All. I had planned a telco for today as I will not be available for the > next two weeks. > > And here is my proposed definition for an attestation: > > Attestation: An attestation is a reference to a source that proves that > the lexical entry has a certain linguistic property (e.g. a sense). > > I propose we talk at 13:00 today to touch base and see how we continue our > discussion on attestation. > > Talk to you later, > > Philipp. > > > > Am 02.06.18 um 12:46 schrieb Ilan Kernerman: > > Dear all, > > Following our last call, here are some suggestions: > > · A *citation* consists of a quote from a corpus (text); it may > either (i) include a reference to its origin (*bibl*), or (ii) not. > > o An *attestation* is the reference to a source (*bibl*) without its > actual *citation*. > > § (in other words, *bibl* and *attestation* might be similar, but the > latter is not preceded by a *citation*) > > · An *example of usage* (or *usage example*) is human-crafted, > whether (i) corpus-inspired/derived, or (ii) not. > > o The *example* can consist of either a full sentence or a short phrase > (and could also be a *citation*) > > § (there are different types of examples – mainly of general patterns, > for reception/decoding purposes, active for production/encoding – but that > is probably beyond the scope here) > > This might seem like over-simplifying or distorting matters, but I hope it > is useful for more accurate mapping/tagging. > > I think this does not contradict the concerns raised in Fahad’s article J: > > “Lemon, unlike TEI-DICT, however focuses on capturing the conceptual > content of a lexicon, that is, it takes a primarily lexical view of lexical > resources… Hence there is no conflict here between the demands of fidelity > to the text in its lexical view and the text in its editorial and > typographical view as there is in TEI; lemon simply prioritises the former. > ” > > “…a proper encoding of citations attesting to lexical properties must > take into consideration at least two different kinds of conceptual entity: > citations and attestations” > > Best, > > Ilan > > > > -- > > Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano > > AG Semantic Computing > > Exzellenzcluster für Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC) > > Universität Bielefeld > > > > Tel: +49 521 106 12249 > > Fax: +49 521 106 6560 > > Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de > > > > Office CITEC-2.307 > > Universitätsstr. 21-25 > > 33615 Bielefeld, NRW > > Germany > > > > > > -- > > Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano > > AG Semantic Computing > > Exzellenzcluster für Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC) > > Universität Bielefeld > > > > Tel: +49 521 106 12249 > > Fax: +49 521 106 6560 > > Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de > > > > Office CITEC-2.307 > > Universitätsstr. 21-25 > > 33615 Bielefeld, NRW > > Germany > > > ------------------------------ > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Aan dit bericht kunnen geen rechten worden ontleend. > Het bericht is alleen bestemd voor de geadresseerde. > Indien het bericht niet voor u is bestemd, verzoeken wij > u dit aan ons te melden en het bericht te verwijderen. > > This message shall not constitute any obligations. > This message is intended solely for the addressee. > If you have received this message in error, please > inform us and delete the message. > ---------------------------------------------------------- > -- Julia Bosque Gil PhD Student Ontology Engineering Group <http://www.oeg-upm.net/> Departamento de Inteligencia Artificial Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
Received on Monday, 4 June 2018 13:22:48 UTC