RE: Next call of ontolex community group

Dear Philipp

With regard to Manuel’s suggestion, my experience with 7-person skype meetings is good. Are we more than 25 in this discussion group?

Regards
Ilan

From: Manuel Fiorelli [mailto:manuel.fiorelli@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2017 3:25 AM
To: Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
Cc: public-ontolex@w3.org
Subject: Re: Next call of ontolex community group

Dear Philipp

I've not verified it by myself, but I found a documentation page telling that Skype (now) supports group calls with up to 25 participants (https://www.skype.com/en/features/group-calls/).

25 is definitely less that the 104 participants in the OntoLex group, but I don't know if it is still sufficient.

Regards,
Manuel




2017-09-01 15:27 GMT+02:00 Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de<mailto:cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>>:

Hi all,

   it was brought to my attention that some people have an issue using the Powwownow service due to the associated costs. I understand this very well.

The thing is: most reliable video/audio conferencing systems that I know of either cost a fee or operate a freemium model with a maximum number of participants.

If you have any suggestions, which free conferencing service we could use, let me know please.

Kind regards,

Philipp

Am 01.09.17 um 11:19 schrieb Julia Bosque Gil:

Hi, Philipp, all:

2017-09-01 8:33 GMT+02:00 Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de<mailto:cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>>:

Dear all,

 I hope you all had some time to relax during the summer break.

This is a gentle reminder that we agreed to have our next call of the ontolex community on September 5th, 14:00 CEST (12:00 UTC).

Here is the entry for the call in our wiki:

https://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Teleconference,_2017.9.5,_14-15_pm_CET#Agenda


@Julia: you wanted to work out the examples for the different options in RDF mentioned below as far as I remember. Is there any progress on this?

Yes, I am working on new diagrams and RDF examples for these options. After our last telco I've been receiving some feedback and ideas from the community for other approaches (e.g. a division of DictionaryEntry in DictionaryEntryComponent(s) in analogy to tabular data models) as well as further examples for the issues listed on the Wiki [https://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Lexicography]. I will update that section along today and Monday morning with everything.

Best,

Julia

DictionaryEntry as a group of lexical senses

      DictionaryEntry as a group of lexical entries

      DictionaryEntry as a group of lexical senses and/or lexical entries

      LexicalDictionaryEntry [?] as a group of lexical entries and SenseDictionaryEntry [?] as a group of lexical senses.

As a further point in the agenda I would like to discuss which concrete cases of lexicographic resources we want to focus on.

Talk to you then!

Philipp



--

--

Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano

AG Semantic Computing

Exzellenzcluster für Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC)

Universität Bielefeld



Tel: +49 521 106 12249<tel:+49%20521%2010612249>

Fax: +49 521 106 6560<tel:+49%20521%201066560>

Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de<mailto:cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>



Office CITEC-2.307

Universitätsstr. 21-25

33615 Bielefeld, NRW

Germany
​
--
  Julia Bosque Gil PhD Student Ontology Engineering Group<http://www.oeg-upm.net/>
Departamento de Inteligencia Artificial
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

--

--

Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano

AG Semantic Computing

Exzellenzcluster für Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC)

Universität Bielefeld



Tel: +49 521 106 12249<tel:+49%20521%2010612249>

Fax: +49 521 106 6560<tel:+49%20521%201066560>

Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de<mailto:cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>



Office CITEC-2.307

Universitätsstr. 21-25

33615 Bielefeld, NRW

Germany



--
Manuel Fiorelli