Re: Next call of ontolex community group

Dear Philipp

I've not verified it by myself, but I found a documentation page telling
that Skype (now) supports group calls with up to 25 participants (
https://www.skype.com/en/features/group-calls/).

25 is definitely less that the 104 participants in the OntoLex group, but I
don't know if it is still sufficient.

Regards,
Manuel




2017-09-01 15:27 GMT+02:00 Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
:

> Hi all,
>
>    it was brought to my attention that some people have an issue using the
> Powwownow service due to the associated costs. I understand this very well.
>
> The thing is: most reliable video/audio conferencing systems that I know
> of either cost a fee or operate a freemium model with a maximum number of
> participants.
>
> If you have any suggestions, which free conferencing service we could use,
> let me know please.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Philipp
>
> Am 01.09.17 um 11:19 schrieb Julia Bosque Gil:
>
> Hi, Philipp, all:
>
> 2017-09-01 8:33 GMT+02:00 Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de
> >:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>>  I hope you all had some time to relax during the summer break.
>>
>> This is a gentle reminder that we agreed to have our next call of the
>> ontolex community on September 5th, 14:00 CEST (12:00 UTC).
>>
>> Here is the entry for the call in our wiki:
>>
>> https://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Teleconference,_20
>> 17.9.5,_14-15_pm_CET#Agenda
>>
>> @Julia: you wanted to work out the examples for the different options in
>> RDF mentioned below as far as I remember. Is there any progress on this?
>>
> Yes, I am working on new diagrams and RDF examples for these options.
> After our last telco I've been receiving some feedback and ideas from the
> community for other approaches (e.g. a division of DictionaryEntry in
> DictionaryEntryComponent(s) in analogy to tabular data models) as well as
> further examples for the issues listed on the Wiki [
> https://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Lexicography]. I will update
> that section along today and Monday morning with everything.
>
> Best,
>
> Julia
>
>> DictionaryEntry as a group of lexical senses
>>       DictionaryEntry as a group of lexical entries
>>       DictionaryEntry as a group of lexical senses and/or lexical entries
>>       LexicalDictionaryEntry [?] as a group of lexical entries and SenseDictionaryEntry [?] as a group of lexical senses.
>>
>> As a further point in the agenda I would like to discuss which concrete
>> cases of lexicographic resources we want to focus on.
>>
> Talk to you then!
>>
>> Philipp
>>
>> --
>> --
>> Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano
>> AG Semantic Computing
>> Exzellenzcluster für Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC)
>> Universität Bielefeld
>>
>> Tel: +49 521 106 12249 <+49%20521%2010612249>
>> Fax: +49 521 106 6560 <+49%20521%201066560>
>> Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de
>>
>> Office CITEC-2.307
>> Universitätsstr. 21-25
>> 33615 Bielefeld, NRW
>> Germany
>>
>> ​
> --
>   Julia Bosque Gil PhD Student Ontology Engineering Group
> <http://www.oeg-upm.net/>
> Departamento de Inteligencia Artificial
> Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
>
> --
> --
> Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano
> AG Semantic Computing
> Exzellenzcluster für Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC)
> Universität Bielefeld
>
> Tel: +49 521 106 12249 <+49%20521%2010612249>
> Fax: +49 521 106 6560 <+49%20521%201066560>
> Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de
>
> Office CITEC-2.307
> Universitätsstr. 21-25
> 33615 Bielefeld, NRW
> Germany
>
>


-- 
Manuel Fiorelli