- From: John McCrae <john@mccr.ae>
- Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 12:02:32 +0000
- To: Fahad Khan <anasfkhan81@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-ontolex <public-ontolex@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 22 March 2017 12:03:05 UTC
Hi Fahad, Yes, you make a good point! It is probably a very good idea and I can see the use case for introducing an isEntryOf property. Perhaps, we can add this when we add new modules that are being discussed? All I can say in our defence is that other models such as SKOS <https://www.w3.org/2009/08/skos-reference/skos.html#member> do it the same way... Regards, John On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Fahad Khan <anasfkhan81@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Everyone, > Studying the ontolex model again I noticed there was no inverse relation > for the lime:entry relation between a lexicon and its entries. Won't this > cause problems if I'm working with a large lexicon where the individual > entries belong to separate files with the lexicon file pointing to each > entry? I can point one way (lexicon -> entry) but not back (at least not > with an ontolex relation). Or maybe I've misunderstood something. > Cheers, > Fahad >
Received on Wednesday, 22 March 2017 12:03:05 UTC