- From: Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
- Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 23:47:35 +0200
- To: "public-ontolex@w3.org" <public-ontolex@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <555E5277.7000609@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
Dear all, here is the list of issues to discuss tomorrow for the synsem module, summarizing all the comments received: 1. The definition of 'other form' still says '[Other form] should be .... an abbreviation, short form or acronym'. This is incorrect and contradicts the definition of lexical entry. Can we add an example clarifying the representation of abbreviations? -> added to the agenda for tomorrow 2) Rethink example 10 3) Example 17: is supposed to show how to use denotes and evokes. We could change the IATE concept. 4) I agree that the definition of semantic frame could be simplified. I propose we adop the ones proposed by John: *Semantic Frames* are the meaning of a word (and hence are also lexical senses) but expressed by one or more ontological predicates and their arguments. This sense of the word can only be understood when all of its required arguments are realized. Similarly we need to change subframe to *Subframe *relates a complex semantic frame to frames for each of the individual ontological predicates that form the complex semantic frame. 5) Examples 5 and 6: I think they are important to show people how to use the model also in more complex cases. I strongly argue to keep them! Examples are key to make people adopt the model. Many things are not understandable from the descriptions alone... 6) Example 8 uses isA but should be made clearer. 7) In the definition you use the words "subjects" and "objects" at plural: not sure, if it more appropriate to use the singular form. 8) I fear that the use of the inverseOf construct could be not very readable. A simpler solution could be simply use "fatherOf", although I suspect that this name does not conform with current best practices. 9) Renaming Frame to "Syntactic Frame" is indeed an option that we could consider tomorrow. 10) Introduce subclasses of Argument: Syntactic Argument and Semantic Argument 11) Opening film example: add more prepositions (of, at, for) and make the argument optional. 12) Change alma mater example: graduate from -> studied at And here are the access details: https://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Teleconference,_2015.5.22,_16-17_pm_CET Talk to you tomorrow! Philipp. -- -- Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano AG Semantic Computing Exzellenzcluster für Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC) Universität Bielefeld Tel: +49 521 106 12249 Fax: +49 521 106 6560 Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de Office CITEC-2.307 Universitätsstr. 21-25 33615 Bielefeld, NRW Germany
Received on Thursday, 21 May 2015 21:48:05 UTC