W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ontolex@w3.org > October 2014

telco today at 15:00

From: Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 11:48:12 +0200
Message-ID: <5440E5DC.2050004@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
To: "public-ontolex@w3.org" <public-ontolex@w3.org>
Dear all,

  here are the access details for the ontolex teleconference today at 
15:00 (CET):


The agenda is repeated here for the sake of convenience:


    In core there is now a 'SenseLexicon' class but no property to relate it any other elements in the model
    We could/should consider using dct:language instead of ontolex:languageURI
    We cannot give conditions when a Lexical Sense should apply (lemon had a condition property for this)
    It would be useful to indicate when a mapping is dependent on the range or domain of a property (possibly)
    Should we add subclasses of LexicalEntry as follows Word, MultiWordExpression, Affix?

Syntax and Semantics

    There is no property to indicate the conjugation (morphological pattern) of a word


    Lexical Variant is defined between either forms or lexical entries... there should be a class that is only for forms and a class that is only for entries
    All variants are specified only in their 'reified' form, do we want to allow users to directly state variation between two entries (or forms or senses) with a single triple?
    Are the Interlingual-/IntralingualVariant classes necessary?
    Representing confidence and human validation (Jorge)


    Examples provided by Philipp => discussion
    There is no link between the metadata module and any other module in OntoLex
    The Lexicon class is a duplicate of one already in the core
    The language property is a duplicate of one defined in the core
    ConceptualizedLinguisticResource is not used by any other part of module
    The 'lexical link set' class and property are not used by any other part of the module
    Several properties are named the same as classes except for the case of the first letter: resourceCoverage, language, lexicalLinkSet and lexicalization
    Is the 'linguistic model' really required by every lexicalization?

Talk to you later,


Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano
AG Semantic Computing
Exzellenzcluster für Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC)
Universität Bielefeld

Tel: +49 521 106 12249
Fax: +49 521 106 6560
Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de

Office CITEC-2.307
Universitätsstr. 21-25
33615 Bielefeld, NRW
Received on Friday, 17 October 2014 09:48:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:36:45 UTC