W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ontolex@w3.org > October 2014

Re: teleconference tomorrow 15:00

From: John P. McCrae <jmccrae@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 12:34:04 +0200
Message-ID: <CAC5njqqdoaJp_giMWWrb_pNf0jEZot=PMgdwEko3xFZgAxrYyA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jorge Gracia <jgracia@fi.upm.es>
Cc: Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>, "public-ontolex@w3.org" <public-ontolex@w3.org>
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Jorge Gracia <jgracia@fi.upm.es> wrote:

> Dear Philipp, all,
>
> I have removed the inter/intralingual variants form the wiki final
> specification (as we already agreed on that) and done some cleaning in the
> Vartrans module (fix wrong prefixes and stuff like that).
>
> I would add a couple of minor bullets in the agenda, for the Vartrans
> module:
> - Find a name for a superproperty of vartrans:source and vartrans:target
> to be used in case the directionality of the variation relation is not
> known or it is not important.
> - Possibility of adding a couple of properties to Translation such as
> confidence degree or a boolean indicating whether it is human validated,
> for instance.
>
I think we agreed to keep this as a data category, as it is very hard to
define 'confidence' in general

Regards,
John

>
> Regards,
> Jorge
>
> 2014-10-16 9:32 GMT+02:00 Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de
> >:
>
>>  Dear all,
>>
>>  this is a gentle reminder that we will have our weekly ontolex
>> teleconference on Friday, 15:00.
>> I will circulate access details by latest tomorrow.
>>
>> Here are the main agenda points (taken from John's email):
>>
>> Core:
>>
>>    - In core there is now a 'SenseLexicon' class but no property to
>>    relate it any other elements in the model
>>    - We could/should consider using dct:language instead of
>>    ontolex:languageURI
>>    - We cannot give conditions when a Lexical Sense should apply (lemon
>>    had a condition property for this)
>>    - It would be useful to indicate when a mapping is dependent on the
>>    range or domain of a property (possibly)
>>    - Should we add subclasses of LexicalEntry as follows Word,
>>    MultiWordExpression, Affix?
>>
>> Syntax and Semantics
>>
>>    - There is no property to indicate the conjugation (morphological
>>    pattern) of a word
>>
>>  Variation
>>
>>    - Lexical Variant is defined between either forms *or* lexical
>>    entries... there should be a class that is only for forms and a class that
>>    is only for entries
>>    - All variants are specified only in their 'reified' form, do we want
>>    to allow users to directly state variation between two entries (or forms or
>>    senses) with a single triple?
>>    - Are the Interlingual-/IntralingualVariant classes necessary?
>>
>>  Metadata
>>
>>    - There is no link between the metadata module and any other module
>>    in OntoLex
>>    - The Lexicon class is a duplicate of one already in the core
>>    - The language property is a duplicate of one defined in the core
>>    - ConceptualizedLinguisticResource is not used by any other part of
>>    module
>>    - The 'lexical link set' class and property are not used by any other
>>    part of the module
>>    - Several properties are named the same as classes except for the
>>    case of the first letter: resourceCoverage, language, lexicalLinkSet and
>>    lexicalization
>>    - Is the 'linguistic model' really required by every lexicalization?
>>
>>
>> Please check also the examples on the metadata module that I will send
>> today.
>>
>> We should also discuss the issue brought up by Francesca. My feeling is
>> also that it is akward to see anonyms as "variants". They are clearly
>> semantic relations that we should not specify further. So we could think
>> about introducing a generic "senseRelation".
>>
>> On the issue of variation that John raises: we could add two classes
>> LexicalFormVariant and LexicalSenseVariant; the interlingual and
>> intralingual variants we agreed to leave out of the model. But we wanted to
>> keep translation as a subclass of LexicalSenseVariant I think.
>>
>> Talk to you tomorrow,
>>
>> Philipp.
>>
>>
>> --
>> --
>> Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano
>> AG Semantic Computing
>> Exzellenzcluster für Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC)
>> Universität Bielefeld
>>
>> Tel: +49 521 106 12249
>> Fax: +49 521 106 6560
>> Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de
>>
>> Office CITEC-2.307
>> Universitätsstr. 21-25
>> 33615 Bielefeld, NRW
>> Germany
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Jorge Gracia, PhD
> Ontology Engineering Group
> Artificial Intelligence Department
> Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
> http://jogracia.url.ph/web/
>
Received on Thursday, 16 October 2014 10:34:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:36:45 UTC