Re: ontolex.owl

On 27.06.2014 14:02, Philipp Cimiano wrote:
> Hi Thierry,
>
>   of course it is possible to represent relations between senses. It 
> is also possible to represent relations between Lexical Concepts.
>
> Howver, so far we have not pre-defined any vocabulary for doing this 
> and as far as I see we do not intend to do this.
>
> Reusing skos:broader and skos:narrower is perfectly fine for 
> ontolex:LexicalConcept(s).
>
> Other proprietary relations can be used.
>
> I am happy to discuss this later.

Thanks Philipp,

And this sounds perfect to me. Agreeing that ontolex does not have to 
introduce vocabulary for this then.
Cheers

Thierry

-- 
Thierry Declerck,
Senior Consultant at DFKI GmbH, Language Technology Lab
Stuhlsatzenhausweg, 3
D-66123 Saarbruecken
Phone: +49 681 / 857 75-53 58
Fax: +49 681 / 857 75-53 38
email: declerck@dfki.de

-------------------------------------------------------------
Deutsches Forschungszentrum fuer Kuenstliche Intelligenz GmbH
Firmensitz: Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern

Geschaeftsfuehrung:
Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender)
Dr. Walter Olthoff

Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats:
Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes

Amtsgericht Kaiserslautern, HRB 2313
-------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Friday, 27 June 2014 12:07:42 UTC