- From: Manuel Fiorelli <fiorelli@info.uniroma2.it>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 12:43:15 +0200
- To: Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
- Cc: public-ontolex@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAGDmdGjoVJypDUyoU3DUggvjtME63W3yZTzJPc4GEX6O6VD9iA@mail.gmail.com>
Dear all, Armando is not going to participate in the meeting, because he is abroad for a conference. However, I'm going to partecipate. Therefore, we can discuss the metadata vocabulary, and reach consensus at least on the "less controversial" parts. Il 06/giu/2014 09:00 "Philipp Cimiano" <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de> ha scritto: > Dear all, > > we have a few things to discuss today, I would propose splitting the > slot in two parts: > > 1) Discussion about ontolex changes (30 mins, with decisions on the single > points) > > 1.1) Introducing Lexicalization into the core model (decision) > 1.2) Naming the property between a "Lexical Sense" and a "Lexical > Concept"; contains was not regarded as appropriate by many, so proposals on > the table are: realizes/isRealizedBy, lexicalizes/isLexicalizedBy, > instantiates/isInstantiatedBy, substantiates/isSubstantiatedBy, > means/isMeaningOf as well as expresses/isExpressedBy; I am fine with at > least 3 of them ;-) > 1.3) Discussion: renaming property lexicalForm to simply "form" > 1.4) Discussion: introducing property "definition" as a subclass of > rdfs:comment with domain ontolex:LexicalSense > 1.5) Discussion: explicitly introducing the class "Reference" as the > range of "reference" as we have it anyway in most our diagrams; has no > practical neither theoretical implications other than clarity (IMHO) and > increasing the size of the module by one class > > 2) Discussion on lime proposal sent by Manuel/Armando (this assumes that > Armando will be there to walk us through) -> 30 mins. (no decision) > > Btw: I finally managed to find a nice tool to produce UML-style > visualizations of our models. It is called draw.io ;-) I attach a diagram > that reflects the current state of the ontolex module. The diagram is in > the GIT repo as well (where cardinalities are not indicated they are 0..n). > > I propose to postpone the discussion about Translation for another > occasion. I need to make up my mind myself there. I will send a separate > email on this. > > Access details can be found here as usual: https://www.w3.org/community/ > ontolex/wiki/Teleconference,_2014.06.06,_15-16_pm_CET > > Talk to you later! > > Philipp. > > -- > > Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano > > Phone: +49 521 106 12249 > Fax: +49 521 106 12412 > Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de > > Forschungsbau Intelligente Systeme (FBIIS) > Raum 2.307 > Universität Bielefeld > Inspiration 1 > 33619 Bielefeld > >
Received on Friday, 6 June 2014 10:43:43 UTC