- From: John P. McCrae <jmccrae@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 14:26:45 +0200
- To: public-ontolex <public-ontolex@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 11 July 2014 12:27:13 UTC
Hi Philipp, all,
I notice in the spec and in the examples in the repository we still have
the following:
:lex_colour a ontolex:LexicalEntry;
ontolex:form :form_colour;
ontolex:form :form_color.
:form_colour ontolex:writtenRep "colour"@en-GB.
:form_color ontolex:writtenRep "color"@en-US.
That is: we use a different form URL for "color"@en-US to "colour"@en-GB.
This is IMHO not correct for two reasons
- It involves duplicating any syntactic annotations on the form (e.g.,
saying "colours" is a third-person present singular form of the verb and so
is "colors")
- It makes it impossible to decide which form is canonical, without
putting the US form above the rest-of-the-world's form or vica versa.
Is this just an oversight, or does this still need to be discussed?
Regards,
John
Received on Friday, 11 July 2014 12:27:13 UTC