- From: John P. McCrae <jmccrae@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 14:26:45 +0200
- To: public-ontolex <public-ontolex@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 11 July 2014 12:27:13 UTC
Hi Philipp, all, I notice in the spec and in the examples in the repository we still have the following: :lex_colour a ontolex:LexicalEntry; ontolex:form :form_colour; ontolex:form :form_color. :form_colour ontolex:writtenRep "colour"@en-GB. :form_color ontolex:writtenRep "color"@en-US. That is: we use a different form URL for "color"@en-US to "colour"@en-GB. This is IMHO not correct for two reasons - It involves duplicating any syntactic annotations on the form (e.g., saying "colours" is a third-person present singular form of the verb and so is "colors") - It makes it impossible to decide which form is canonical, without putting the US form above the rest-of-the-world's form or vica versa. Is this just an oversight, or does this still need to be discussed? Regards, John
Received on Friday, 11 July 2014 12:27:13 UTC