Re: ontolex.owl

Hi John, all,

  ok so what does it mean technically "to include links to semiotics.owl 
... avoiding an OWL import statement" ?

Philipp.

Am 03.07.14 06:44, schrieb John P. McCrae:
>
> Hi,
>
> We should include links to semiotics.owl and other relevant resources, 
> but unless we are dependent on that model we should avoid using an OWL 
> import statement
>
> Regards,
> John
>
> On 2 Jul 2014 21:02, "Philipp Cimiano" 
> <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de 
> <mailto:cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>> wrote:
>
>     Aldo,
>
>     right. Is anyone against including this alignment in the spec.
>
>     Please shout now or be silent forever.
>
>     Philipp.
>
>
>     Am 27.06.14 16:23, schrieb Aldo Gangemi:
>
>         Too late for the call, sorry.
>         Yes, that is what I intended: it’s bizarre that we include an
>         alignment without even mentioning in the spec :)
>         A
>
>         On Jun 27, 2014, at 4:18:22 PM , Philipp Cimiano
>         <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de
>         <mailto:cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>> wrote:
>
>             Hi Aldo,
>
>             not sure I get your comment. Are you saying: If you import
>             semiotics.owl, please mention it also in the spec?
>             Just trying to understand what exactly is bizarre ;-)
>
>             Philipp.
>
>             Am 27.06.14 14:21, schrieb Aldo Gangemi:
>
>                 Hi I will try to attend this telco. Anyway, I missed
>                 the discussion about not including semiotics.owl in
>                 the spec. I remember we said these alignments should
>                 not be part of the core itself, but maybe we should
>                 mention that it exists in the owl implementation, and
>                 why. As it is, it sounds bizarre :)
>                 Aldo
>
>                 sent by aldo from a mobile
>
>                     On 23/giu/2014, at 08:28, Philipp Cimiano
>                     <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de
>                     <mailto:cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>> wrote:
>
>                     Dear all,
>
>                     I have been working on ensuring consistency of the
>                     ontolex.owl module with the spec.
>
>                     I have:
>
>                     1) made sure that all axioms in the ontology
>                     correspond to those in the spec; the ontology is
>                     consistent ;-)
>                     2) ensured that all domain / ranges match
>                     3) introduced examples illustrating the use in the
>                     git under directory "Examples"
>                     4) included the semiotics.owl ontology as we
>                     decided some time ago; we agreed to not have this
>                     in the spec, but in the actual ontology, see
>                     ontology file
>
>                     I attach the current version of the ontolex.owl
>                     module (see attached).
>
>                     I would kindly ask you to help me to ensure that
>                     the example in Examples are fine. I did not find a
>                     service to validate the files (they are in Turtle
>                     syntax). Can someone please check them and modify
>                     them appropriately, modifying also the spec where
>                     these example are given?
>
>                     I would like to finalize the model on our telco on
>                     Friday, so please raise any concerns this week.
>
>                     Please carefully review the ontology and the text;
>                     if you spot any issues, please let me know.
>
>                     I have added a pointer to the GIT in the main wiki
>                     page.
>
>                     Best regards,
>
>                     Philipp.
>
>
>                     -- 
>
>                     Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano
>
>                     Phone: +49 521 106 12249
>                     <tel:%2B49%20521%20106%2012249>
>                     Fax: +49 521 106 12412 <tel:%2B49%20521%20106%2012412>
>                     Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de
>                     <mailto:cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
>
>                     Forschungsbau Intelligente Systeme (FBIIS)
>                     Raum 2.307
>                     Universität Bielefeld
>                     Inspiration 1
>                     33619 Bielefeld
>
>                     <OntolexCore.png>
>
>             -- 
>             --
>             Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano
>             AG Semantic Computing
>             Exzellenzcluster für Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC)
>             Universität Bielefeld
>
>             Tel: +49 521 106 12249 <tel:%2B49%20521%20106%2012249>
>             Fax: +49 521 106 6560 <tel:%2B49%20521%20106%206560>
>             Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de
>             <mailto:cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
>
>             Office CITEC-2.307
>             Universitätsstr. 21-25
>             33615 Bielefeld, NRW
>             Germany
>
>
>
>     -- 
>     --
>     Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano
>     AG Semantic Computing
>     Exzellenzcluster für Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC)
>     Universität Bielefeld
>
>     Tel: +49 521 106 12249 <tel:%2B49%20521%20106%2012249>
>     Fax: +49 521 106 6560 <tel:%2B49%20521%20106%206560>
>     Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de
>     <mailto:cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
>
>     Office CITEC-2.307
>     Universitätsstr. 21-25
>     33615 Bielefeld, NRW
>     Germany
>
>


-- 

Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano

Phone: +49 521 106 12249
Fax: +49 521 106 12412
Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de

Forschungsbau Intelligente Systeme (FBIIS)
Raum 2.307
Universität Bielefeld
Inspiration 1
33619 Bielefeld