Re: ontolex.owl

Hi,

We should include links to semiotics.owl and other relevant resources, but
unless we are dependent on that model we should avoid using an OWL import
statement

Regards,
John
On 2 Jul 2014 21:02, "Philipp Cimiano" <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
wrote:

> Aldo,
>
> right. Is anyone against including this alignment in the spec.
>
> Please shout now or be silent forever.
>
> Philipp.
>
>
> Am 27.06.14 16:23, schrieb Aldo Gangemi:
>
>> Too late for the call, sorry.
>> Yes, that is what I intended: it’s bizarre that we include an alignment
>> without even mentioning in the spec :)
>> A
>>
>> On Jun 27, 2014, at 4:18:22 PM , Philipp Cimiano <
>> cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de> wrote:
>>
>>  Hi Aldo,
>>>
>>> not sure I get your comment. Are you saying: If you import
>>> semiotics.owl, please mention it also in the spec?
>>> Just trying to understand what exactly is bizarre ;-)
>>>
>>> Philipp.
>>>
>>> Am 27.06.14 14:21, schrieb Aldo Gangemi:
>>>
>>>> Hi I will try to attend this telco. Anyway, I missed the discussion
>>>> about not including semiotics.owl in the spec. I remember we said these
>>>> alignments should not be part of the core itself, but maybe we should
>>>> mention that it exists in the owl implementation, and why. As it is, it
>>>> sounds bizarre :)
>>>> Aldo
>>>>
>>>> sent by aldo from a mobile
>>>>
>>>>  On 23/giu/2014, at 08:28, Philipp Cimiano <
>>>>> cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have been working on ensuring consistency of the ontolex.owl module
>>>>> with the spec.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) made sure that all axioms in the ontology correspond to those in
>>>>> the spec; the ontology is consistent ;-)
>>>>> 2) ensured that all domain / ranges match
>>>>> 3) introduced examples illustrating the use in the git under directory
>>>>> "Examples"
>>>>> 4) included the semiotics.owl ontology as we decided some time ago; we
>>>>> agreed to not have this in the spec, but in the actual ontology, see
>>>>> ontology file
>>>>>
>>>>> I attach the current version of the ontolex.owl module (see attached).
>>>>>
>>>>> I would kindly ask you to help me to ensure that the example in
>>>>> Examples are fine. I did not find a service to validate the files (they are
>>>>> in Turtle syntax). Can someone please check them and modify them
>>>>> appropriately, modifying also the spec where these example are given?
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to finalize the model on our telco on Friday, so please
>>>>> raise any concerns this week.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please carefully review the ontology and the text; if you spot any
>>>>> issues, please let me know.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have added a pointer to the GIT in the main wiki page.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Philipp.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano
>>>>>
>>>>> Phone: +49 521 106 12249
>>>>> Fax: +49 521 106 12412
>>>>> Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de
>>>>>
>>>>> Forschungsbau Intelligente Systeme (FBIIS)
>>>>> Raum 2.307
>>>>> Universität Bielefeld
>>>>> Inspiration 1
>>>>> 33619 Bielefeld
>>>>>
>>>>> <OntolexCore.png>
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>> --
>>> Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano
>>> AG Semantic Computing
>>> Exzellenzcluster für Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC)
>>> Universität Bielefeld
>>>
>>> Tel: +49 521 106 12249
>>> Fax: +49 521 106 6560
>>> Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de
>>>
>>> Office CITEC-2.307
>>> Universitätsstr. 21-25
>>> 33615 Bielefeld, NRW
>>> Germany
>>>
>>>
>>
> --
> --
> Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano
> AG Semantic Computing
> Exzellenzcluster für Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC)
> Universität Bielefeld
>
> Tel: +49 521 106 12249
> Fax: +49 521 106 6560
> Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de
>
> Office CITEC-2.307
> Universitätsstr. 21-25
> 33615 Bielefeld, NRW
> Germany
>
>
>