- From: Armando Stellato <stellato@info.uniroma2.it>
- Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 20:39:07 +0200
- To: <public-ontolex@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <03f001cf54ec$28c4e0c0$7a4ea240$@info.uniroma2.it>
Dear all,
sorry for taking so long. Please find attached to this email our proposal
for Ontolex-Lime, which we could use as a basis for discussion tomorrow.
It is a bit long, but we tried to keep everything compact and also "modular"
with respect to different topics and issues, so we had:
- one single page the recap of the original lime
- one page for requirements and desiderata (Philipp, we read your
email about the scenarios. In general we agree, but we think it was mixing
two orthogonal dimensions: the independent publication of ontology/lexica
and the number of involved lexica/ontologies; we tried to sketch here an
alternative view. Sorry we were not in time for a figure, but we can add it
later)
- half a page for use case scenarios
- a rationale for the use of Lexicalizations
- a concrete proposal for the metadata model
- two more half pages for discussions related to:
o the ratio vs integer issue
o the use of senses in lexicalizations (we read the emails of today and
decided to reply to everything in this single document)
Cheers,
Armando and Manuel
--------------------------------------------------
Ing. Armando Stellato, PhD
AI Research Group,
Dept. of Enterprise Engineering
University of Roma, Tor Vergata
Via del Politecnico 1 00133 ROMA (ITALY)
tel: +39 06 7259 7330 (office, room A1-14);
+39 06 7259 7332 (lab)
fax: +39 06 7259 7460
e_mail: <mailto:stellato@info.uniroma2.it> stellato@info.uniroma2.it
--------------------------------------------------
Attachments
- application/pdf attachment: ontolex-lime_proposal.pdf
Received on Thursday, 10 April 2014 18:39:51 UTC