- From: Armando Stellato <stellato@info.uniroma2.it>
- Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 20:39:07 +0200
- To: <public-ontolex@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <03f001cf54ec$28c4e0c0$7a4ea240$@info.uniroma2.it>
Dear all, sorry for taking so long. Please find attached to this email our proposal for Ontolex-Lime, which we could use as a basis for discussion tomorrow. It is a bit long, but we tried to keep everything compact and also "modular" with respect to different topics and issues, so we had: - one single page the recap of the original lime - one page for requirements and desiderata (Philipp, we read your email about the scenarios. In general we agree, but we think it was mixing two orthogonal dimensions: the independent publication of ontology/lexica and the number of involved lexica/ontologies; we tried to sketch here an alternative view. Sorry we were not in time for a figure, but we can add it later) - half a page for use case scenarios - a rationale for the use of Lexicalizations - a concrete proposal for the metadata model - two more half pages for discussions related to: o the ratio vs integer issue o the use of senses in lexicalizations (we read the emails of today and decided to reply to everything in this single document) Cheers, Armando and Manuel -------------------------------------------------- Ing. Armando Stellato, PhD AI Research Group, Dept. of Enterprise Engineering University of Roma, Tor Vergata Via del Politecnico 1 00133 ROMA (ITALY) tel: +39 06 7259 7330 (office, room A1-14); +39 06 7259 7332 (lab) fax: +39 06 7259 7460 e_mail: <mailto:stellato@info.uniroma2.it> stellato@info.uniroma2.it --------------------------------------------------
Attachments
- application/pdf attachment: ontolex-lime_proposal.pdf
Received on Thursday, 10 April 2014 18:39:51 UTC