W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ontolex@w3.org > April 2014

R: ontolex meeting this week, Friday 15:00 (CET)

From: Armando Stellato <stellato@info.uniroma2.it>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 23:03:25 +0200
Message-ID: <533c7b23.42fb0e0a.0e4d.ffff9a40@mx.google.com>
To: Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>, "public-ontolex@w3.org" <public-ontolex@w3.org>
Thanks Philipp,

I didn't send a proposal in terms of vocabulary until now as (as anticipated in my last email) I was waiting for feedback about Manuel's and mine last email, via email in turn or through discussion on one of these fridays. 
The reply from John seems positive, apart from the preference on absolute values (the links) instead of ratios. As much as we recognize the importance of representing this third entity (the lexicalization dataset) and that we are counting the number of lexicalizations (the links between lexical entries and onto resources), which cannot be ascribed to any of the other available stats, I am quite happy :)
Said the above, if I may tell..still my preferences goes to the ratio. Given that the count on ontology resources may not be always available, and that a lexicalization palely refers to a (given version of a) dataset/ontology, I would not incur in the risk of not having a denominator to play with (conversely I don't care too much about not having integers..that kind of fear about error propagation does not belong to this field nor its possible scenarios IMHO..). Still, here I am in the area of less objective considerations, so..
GOTO my previous statement about being happy with the above ;)

Regarding a concrete vocabulary proposal, I may check the first emails we exchanged offlist while the Friday meetings and the ML were hot on other topics.

Cheers,

Armando



----- Messaggio originale -----
Da: "Philipp Cimiano" <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
Inviato: ‎02/‎04/‎2014 20.33
A: "public-ontolex@w3.org" <public-ontolex@w3.org>
Oggetto: Re: ontolex meeting this week, Friday 15:00 (CET)

Armando,

no worries, I will make a proposal in the wiki that you can comment on 
by email.

Best regards and good flight.

Philipp.

Am 02.04.14 18:58, schrieb Armando Stellato:
> Dear Philipp,
>
> I'm sorry I can 't make it next Friday. I'm currently in Amsterdam and I'll
> be on my flight back to Rome exactly at that time.
>
> Apologies,
>
> Armando
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Philipp Cimiano [mailto:cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de]
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 2, 2014 4:02 PM
>> To: public-ontolex@w3.org
>> Subject: ontolex meeting this week, Friday 15:00 (CET)
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>>    this is a gentle reminder that we will have our regular ontolex meeting
> this
>> week on Friday 15:00 (CET).
>>
>> The main topic will be to discuss the metadata module. I will prepare a
> basis
>> for discussion tomorrow.
>>
>> Please find the access details here:
>>
>> https://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Teleconference,_2014.04.04,
>> _15-16_pm_CET
>>
>> Talk to you on Friday,
>>
>> Philipp.
>>
>> --
>>
>> Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano
>>
>> Phone: +49 521 106 12249
>> Fax: +49 521 106 12412
>> Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de
>>
>> Forschungsbau Intelligente Systeme (FBIIS) Raum 2.307 Universität
> Bielefeld
>> Inspiration 1
>> 33619 Bielefeld
>
>


-- 

Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano

Phone: +49 521 106 12249
Fax: +49 521 106 12412
Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de

Forschungsbau Intelligente Systeme (FBIIS)
Raum 2.307
Universität Bielefeld
Inspiration 1
33619 Bielefeld
Received on Wednesday, 2 April 2014 21:04:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:36:38 UTC