Re: ontolex telco tomorrow 15:00 CET

Dear all,

although, as Shakespeare, said "a rose by any other name would smell as 
sweet", I think that names matter. I think that keeping 'lemon' (or a 
variant) would suggest that the work we are doing is basically a follow-on 
of the Lemon initiative, which, at the time the group has been 
established, was not the case, at least in my understanding. Hence, I 
think that keeping the original 'ontolex' name is a better option. 

I'm unable to attend the call this evening, sorry about that.

Regards,

Guido Vetere
Manager, Center for Advanced Studies IBM Italia
_________________________________________________
Rome                                     Trento
Via Sciangai 53                       Via Sommarive 18
00144 Roma, Italy                   38123 Povo in Trento
+39 (0)6 59662137 

Mobile: +39 3357454658
_________________________________________________



John McCrae <jmccrae@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de> 
Sent by: johnmccrae@gmail.com
13/09/2013 11:43

To
Guadalupe Aguado de Cea <guadalupe.aguado@upm.es>
cc
Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>, "public-ontolex@w3.org" 
<public-ontolex@w3.org>
Subject
Re: ontolex telco tomorrow 15:00 CET






Hi all,

I apologise I will also not be able to attend as I am travelling today. I 
wanted to make a quick couple of points about the naming of the model.

Firstly, the model is not drastically new in fact in terms of URIs 15 of 
the properties are exactly the same as they are in the original lemon core 
where as only 9 are new introductions, and 4 are not carried over from the 
ontolex core (although these should be included in modules).

Also, I am here at RANLP and lemon has been mentioned in several talks 
including one of the keynotes, at tutorials and many times in the NLP&LOD 
workshop. Many people who I talked to about the naming of the model seemed 
not keen accept a change of name.

For these two reasons I feel that we really should to keep lemon in the 
name but would be happy with Lemon2 or W3C-Lemon as a name

Regards,
John


On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Guadalupe Aguado de Cea <
guadalupe.aguado@upm.es> wrote:
Dear all,

I won't be able to join the telco as I have a meeting in another town.
As for the name of the model, the last 2 suggestions proposed by Phillipp 
and Aldo: lemon2, and lemon-W3C could be Ok, though I'm more inclined to 
the first one, lemon2. Exactly for the reasons given by Philipp.

I know that Elena & Jorge will attend the telco, so they'll tell me about 
the commitments and the modules..
Best regards

Lupe

El 12/09/2013 14:38, Philipp Cimiano escribió:

Dear all,

   this is a gentle reminder that we will have our regular ontolex telco 
tomorrow Friday at the regular time.

See access details here: 
http://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Teleconference,_2013.13.09,_15-16_pm_CET


The agenda from my side is as follows:

1) Modules: decide which modules need to be developed and which use cases 
will drive them, fix responsibles for module development
2) Name of the model: discuss different points of view
3) Linking: what to link to

I look forward to talking to you all on Friday.

Best regards,

Philipp.



-- 
Guadalupe Aguado de Cea
Departamento de Lingüística Aplicada
Miembro del Ontology Engineering Group -OEG
Facultad de Informática
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
Campus de Montegancedo, sn
28660, Boadilla del Monte, Spain

Home page: www.oeg-upm.net
e-mail: guadalupe.aguado@upm.es
Telef.: 34-91-3367415




IBM Italia S.p.A.
Sede Legale: Circonvallazione Idroscalo - 20090 Segrate (MI) 
Cap. Soc. euro 347.256.998,80
C. F. e Reg. Imprese MI 01442240030 - Partita IVA 10914660153
Società con unico azionista
Società soggetta all?attività di direzione e coordinamento di 
International Business Machines Corporation

(Salvo che sia diversamente indicato sopra / Unless stated otherwise 
above)