W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ontolex@w3.org > July 2013

RE: on contains

From: Armando Stellato <stellato@info.uniroma2.it>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 16:53:41 +0200
To: "'Philipp Cimiano'" <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>, <public-ontolex@w3.org>
Message-ID: <003301ce7f0f$9a0b6c80$ce224580$@info.uniroma2.it>
Thanks for the link Philipp!, well, if I had any doubt (but no other&better
solution came to my mind), now I've one more reason in favour of leaving the
"contains" proposal as is.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Philipp Cimiano [mailto:cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de]
> Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 3:26 PM
> To: public-ontolex@w3.org
> Subject: on contains
> 
> Dear all,
> 
>   the old WordNet version of the VU calls the relations between Synsets
and
> WordSenses: containsWordSense as well:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/wordnet-rdf/
> 
> So we follow the tradition in calling this relation "contains"...
> 
> Philipp.
> 
> --
> Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano
> Semantic Computing Group
> Excellence Cluster - Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC) University
of
> Bielefeld
> 
> Phone: +49 521 106 12249
> Fax: +49 521 106 12412
> Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de
> 
> Room H-127
> Morgenbreede 39
> 33615 Bielefeld
Received on Friday, 12 July 2013 14:54:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 10:57:30 UTC