RE: Next Ontolex Meeting, tomorrow, Feb 22, 12:00

Dear all,
 
I’m sorry I cannot attend too. The one-week shift collided with student
exams I set in advance for that date.
However, in the previous days I added more info on:
http://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Specification_of_Requirements/Metad
ata#Metadata_about_RDF_Linguistic_Resources
 
and defined two sets of metadata (one for Lexical Nets, and one for
ontologies enriched with linguistic info). Plus, I reported on my thoughts
(and discussions with other people) regarding the subjects of these
metadata. More to come in the following days.
 
Finally, getting back to a previous msg from Aldo about
http://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Specification_of_Requirements/Linke
d_Data, and his observations about SKOS. I think it is important to
understand if and how SKOS (and SKOS-XL) may be reused in this modeling. 
SKOS concepts may provide the conceptual backbone of lexical resources (e.g.
synsets in wordnet), while reified labels coming from SKOS-XL may allow for
the specification of lexical relationships. Thus, while sitting on top of
the SKOS-XL skeleton, this could be only a:
1)      Subclassing work: e.g. define Senses, Lexical Entry etc… as specific
subclasses of SKOS(XL) elements.
2)      Instantiation:  e.g. A vocabulary of reusable, shareable, lexical
relationships.
 
Cheers,
 
Armando
 
From: Guadalupe Aguado [mailto:gac280771@gmail.com] 
Sent: giovedì 21 febbraio 2013 09.30
To: Philipp Cimiano
Cc: public-ontolex@w3.org
Subject: Re: Next Ontolex Meeting, tomorrow, Feb 22, 12:00
 
Dear Philipp
I'm afraid I won't be able to attend the meeting, as I'll be in a doctoral
thesis board.
Elena will attend the meeting.
Best regards
Lupe
 
2013/2/21 Philipp Cimiano < <mailto:cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
Dear all,

 this is to inform you that tomorrow we will have our regular ontolex
teleconference.

We will continue our discussion of particular examples, in particular
looking at the contributions here:

 
<http://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Specification_of_Requirements/Lexi
con-Ontology-Mapping>
http://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Specification_of_Requirements/Lexic
on-Ontology-Mapping

 
<http://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Specification_of_Requirements_on_T
erminological_Analysis>
http://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Specification_of_Requirements_on_Te
rminological_Analysis

 
<http://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Specification_of_Requirements/Prop
erties-and-Relations-of-Entries>
http://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Specification_of_Requirements/Prope
rties-and-Relations-of-Entries

Paul/Mihael: I do not see any RDF examples in the wiki yet, will you manage
to work them out until tomorrow?

Elena/Lupe: same for you, I do not see any RDF examples in the wiki yet

John: you wanted to work out how to represent Lexical Nets* in lemon, with
WordNet as an example; can you please provide some RDF code for this?

>>From then on, I would discuss how to i) model lexico-syntactic patterns
(Dagmar: are you going to be there?) and ii) how to link entries across
resources. We could start with Framenet / Verbnet for example, then showing
how they can be used within a lemon lexical entry. Linking to wiktionary
could be also considered as well as to ISOCAT.

Another issue will be to look at modelling terminological resources in the
lexicon-ontology model.

Thanks to everybody. We have to get concrete and produce some (draft of a)
spec this year ;-)

Philipp.

-- 
Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano
Semantic Computing Group
Excellence Cluster - Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC)
University of Bielefeld

Phone:  <tel:%2B49%20521%20106%2012249> +49 521 106 12249
Fax:  <tel:%2B49%20521%20106%2012412> +49 521 106 12412
Mail:  <mailto:cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de

Room H-127
Morgenbreede 39
33615 Bielefeld