- From: Gromann, Dagmar <Dagmar.Gromann@wu.ac.at>
- Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 15:31:02 +0000
- To: Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>, "public-ontolex@w3.org" <public-ontolex@w3.org>
Hi Philipp, Thank you for modifying the LSP requirements and even more for the new requirement on term analysis. Best, Dagmar ________________________________________ From: Philipp Cimiano [cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de] Sent: 24 November 2012 23:25 To: public-ontolex@w3.org Subject: Summary of teleconference last Friday Dear all, here is a brief summary of our telco last Friday together with action points for our next telco on Dez. 7th at the usual time, 15:00 (CET). We discussed the following requirements: 1) Express meaning with respect to ontology: http://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Specification_of_Requirements/Lexicon-Ontology-Mapping We generally agreed on the formulation of the requirement. However, Aldo mentioned that the view of the sense as merely a reification might be to restrictive. I propose we define a sense as a "linguistic sign" representing the disambiguated meaning of a lexical entry when interpreted as a given concept c. Technically, the sense object that stands for this disambiguated sense also reifies the relation between the lexical entry and the concept in question. Would that be fine? 2) Valence and high-order mapping: http://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Specification_of_Requirements/Lexicon-Ontology-Mapping We had a first discussion of the main issues raised by John in the text. One of the main questions is whether subcategorized arguments are identified through grammatical functions or through semantic roles. My intuition is that the semantic of the roles played by grammatical functions in a specific construction will be in the ontology, so there is no need to have semantic/thematic roles attached to syntactic arguments. Action Point: Philipp and John to start a discussion 3) Lexico-syntactic patterns: http://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Specification_of_Requirements/Lexico-Syntactic_Patterns We had quite a long discussion on this requirement. Dagmar: would you be ok if I try to rework the text and provide a version of the req. that we can agree upon on Dec. 7th? Action Point: Philipp to modify requirement All: I propose that we create a separate requirement on term analysis, would that be fine? Action Point: Philipp to create new requirement on term analysis Please let me know your comments. Have a good weekend! Philipp. -- Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano Semantic Computing Group Excellence Cluster - Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC) University of Bielefeld Phone: +49 521 106 12249 Fax: +49 521 106 12412 Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de Room H-127 Morgenbreede 39 33615 Bielefeld
Received on Sunday, 25 November 2012 15:31:32 UTC