- From: Jorge Gracia <jgracia@fi.upm.es>
- Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 14:56:54 +0100
- To: public-ontolex@w3.org
Hi Philipp, Let me this last minute addition to the lists (I can post it there myself): DCMI Vocabulary Management Community http://dublincore.org/groups/vocabulary-management/ Regards, Jorge 2012/3/22 Paul Buitelaar <paul.buitelaar@deri.org>: > Philipp, I will also post at relevant LinkedIn groups: > > - Semantic Technologies Group > - Natural Language Processing > - Semantic Search > > > Paul > > > Op 22/03/2012 11:08, Philipp Cimiano schreef: >> >> Dear all, >> >> thanks for all your feedback. I have changed the text according to >> your suggestions. You will find it below. I have not included specific >> research groups here as I assume that you will circulate the call in >> your own groups (UPM, DERI etc.) as well as reasearch groups that work >> on related topics. >> >> The target group is now the following: >> >> Projects: >> >> - Metanet -> Nicoletta >> - Flarenet -> Nicoletta >> - Molto Project -> Paul >> - Multilingual Web WG -> Felix >> - IKS -> Aldo >> - LOD2 -> Philipp (via Sören Auer) >> - DARPA's Machine Reading -> Philipp >> - Open Information Extraction -> Philipp (Oren Etzioni) >> >> Companies >> >> - SAP -> Philipp >> - IBM -> Philipp >> - Elsevier -> Philipp (Veronique Malaise) >> - Mondeca -> Paul (Bernard Vatant) >> - Semantic Web Company -> Emilio >> - Zemanta -> Philipp (Andraz Tori) >> - OpenAmplify -> Aldo >> - Alchemy -> Aldo >> - Expert System -> Philipp (Nico Lavarini) >> - SAS -> Philipp >> >> Mailinglists: >> >> - DBWorld -> Philipp >> - Semweb@w3c -> Philipp >> - Corpora list -> Paul >> - Linguist list -> Philipp >> - ELRA -> Nicoletta >> - Open Linguistics -> John >> - ontolog-forum@ontolog.cim3.net -> Paul >> - Red Linked Data -> Jorge >> - SemWebSpain -> Jorge >> >> - Associations >> - ATALA -> Maxime >> - Web Semantique -> Maxime >> - ACL (not sure, Maxime: why do you think this would be interesting to >> ACL? We are reaching most of the ACL community through the corpora and >> linguistlists anyway, right?) >> >> Could I kindly ask all of you to send the call to the above lists etc. >> this week? Please confirm that you have sent it so that I can keep track >> of where the call has been sent to. >> >> Now we will start working on the requirements on the model. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Philipp >> >> ================================================== >> >> *Call for use cases for the ontology-lexicon model * >> >> >> The W3C Community Group on Ontology Lexica [1] has started its work in >> December 2011. >> >> *** Motivation *** >> >> Ontologies have numerous applications and they represent the conceptual >> backbone of the Semantic Web. In fact, significant work has gone into >> standardization efforts under the auspices of the W3C to produce >> recommendations for data and knowledge representation languages, i.e. >> the Resource Description Framework (RDF) and the Web Ontology Language >> (OWL). However, current web-based knowledge representation languages >> such as OWL and RDF(S) lack the rich linguistic grounding that is >> required for language-mediated access to ontologies. OWL and RDF(S) rely >> on a property rdfs:label to capture the relation between a vocabulary >> element and its (preferred) lexicalization in a given language. This >> lexicalization provides some kind of lexical anchor that makes the >> concept, property, individual etc. understandable to a user. The >> mechanisms for linguistic grounding available in OWL and RDF(S) are thus >> far from being able to capture the necessary linguistic and lexical >> information that NLP applications working with a particular ontology >> need. The mission of the Ontology-Lexicon community group is to develop >> a model for the linguistic grounding of ontologies which allows to >> represent lexical entries containing information about how ontology >> elements (classes, properties, individuals etc.) are realized in >> multiple languages. A more detailed overview of the scope and goal of >> the working group can be found at [3]. >> >> *** Open Call for Use Cases *** >> >> With this call for use cases, we intend to expand the scope of our >> current use cases (see [2]) by including use cases that are inspired by >> more concrete and real applications. >> >> We thus call for participation of industrial stakeholders and >> application developers in the Community Group by providing a description >> of a use case using the template found below. >> >> By this, we offer interested parties the opportunity to participate in >> standardization activities that are relevant and potentially beneficial >> for their application development, and contribute their ideas to the >> process of creating a standard for the representation of ontology >> related lexicons. >> >> We kindly ask you all to send the use case description to Philipp >> Cimiano (cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de) until May 3rd. Any questions >> or comments can be addressed to Philipp Cimiano at the above email >> address. >> >> *** Participation in the Group *** >> >> People interested in the group’s activities, discussion and >> teleconferences are welcome to join the group at [1]. >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/ >> [2] http://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Specification_of_Use_Cases >> [3] >> >> http://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Goals_and_Scope_of_Ontology-Lexica_Community_Group >> >> >> <TEMPLATE> >> >> I. Motivation >> >> This should contain a short motivation of the use case, including a >> description of the application context and why it is relevant to specify >> the meaning of words with respect to a given ontology in the context of >> the application. >> >> II. Description of the use case >> >> This section should describe the use case in more detail, specifying >> what the lexicon-ontology interface would need to look like from the >> point of view of the application and how the lexicon-ontology interface >> is exploited in the context of the given application. If available, the >> ontology for the application should be briefly described. >> >> III. Limitations of existing models >> >> This section should discuss existing models and their limitations with >> respect to the needs of the application in question. >> >> IV. Example >> >> This section should provide a concrete example illustrating what kind of >> knowledge should be stated in the lexicon-ontology interface from the >> point of view of the application and how it would be exploited by the >> application. >> >> V. Requirements >> >> This section is optional and might already advance concrete requirements >> on the lexicon-ontology model. >> >> <TEMPLATE> >> >> ================================== >> >> -- >> Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano >> Semantic Computing Group >> Excellence Cluster - Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC) >> University of Bielefeld >> >> Phone: +49 521 106 12249 >> Fax: +49 521 106 12412 >> Mail:cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de >> >> Room H-127 >> Morgenbreede 39 >> 33615 Bielefeld >> > >
Received on Thursday, 22 March 2012 13:57:41 UTC